The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Potential for Carbon Sequestration Through Reforestation of Abandoned Tropical Agricultural and Pasture Lands
Abstract
Approximately half of the tropical biome is in some stage of recovery from past human disturbance, most of which is in secondary forests growing on abandoned agricultural lands and pastures. Reforestation of these abandoned lands, both natural and managed, has been proposed as a means to help offset increasing carbon emissions to the atmosphere. In this paper we discuss the potential of these forests to serve as sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide in aboveground biomass and soils. A review of literature data shows that aboveground biomass increases at a rate of 6.2 Mg ha−1yr−1during the first 20 years of succession, and at a rate of 2.9 Mg ha−1yr−1over the first 80 years of regrowth. During the first 20 years of regrowth, forests in wet life zones have the fastest rate of aboveground carbon accumulation with reforestation, followed by dry and moist forests. Soil carbon accumulated at a rate of 0.41 Mg ha−1yr−1over a 100‐year period, and at faster rates during the first 20 years (1.30 Mg carbon ha−1yr−1). Past land use affects the rate of both above‐ and belowground carbon sequestration. Forests growing on abandoned agricultural land accumulate biomass faster than other past land uses, while soil carbon accumulates faster on sites that were cleared but not developed, and on pasture sites. Our results indicate that tropical reforestation has the potential to serve as a carbon offset mechanism both above‐ and belowground for at least 40 to 80 years, and possibly much longer. More research is needed to determine the potential for longer‐term carbon sequestration for mitigation of atmospheric CO 2 emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lugo, A. E. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937169 · Cited by 361 · cited 12×
“…1999 16 30 W P S 77 66 Guariguata et al. 1997 16.5 30 W P S 79 68 Guariguata et al. 1997 17 30 W P S 114 98 Guariguata et al. 1997 17 12 W C P 40 74 Lugo 1992b 19 25 W P S 49 49 Lugo et al. 1986 20 30 W A S 102 83 Hughes et al. 1999 20 30 W A S 87 71 Hughes et al. 1999 23 50 W A S 90 51 Brown and…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215
DON, A., SCHUMACHER, J., & FREIBAUER, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x · Cited by 1,477
Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics
Guariguata, M. R., & Ostertag, R. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00535-1 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationMayer, M., Prescott, C. E., Abaker, W. E. A., Augusto, L., Cécillon, L., Ferreira, G. W. D., James, J., Jandl, R., Katzensteiner, K., Laclau, J.-P., et al. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Silver, W. L., Ostertag, R., & Lugo, A. E.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-407
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2147319862
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Potential for Carbon Sequestration Through Reforestation of Abandoned Tropical Agricultural and Pasture Lands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x
- The paper
- Silver, W. L., Ostertag, R., & Lugo, A. E. (2000). The Potential for Carbon Sequestration Through Reforestation of Abandoned Tropical Agricultural and Pasture Lands. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.