The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exotic Plant Species as Problems and Solutions in Ecological Restoration: A Synthesis
Abstract
Exotic species have become increasingly significant management problems in parks and reserves and frequently complicate restoration projects. At the same time there may be circumstances in which their removal may have unforeseen negative consequences or their use in restoration is desirable. We review the types of effects exotic species may have that are important during restoration and suggest research that could increase our ability to set realistic management goals. Their control and use may be controversial; therefore we advocate consideration of exotic species in the greater context of community structure and succession and emphasize areas where ecological research could bring insight to management dilemmas surrounding exotic species and restoration. For example, an understanding of the potential transience of exotics in a site and the role particular exotics might play in changing processes that influence the course of succession is essential to setting removal priorities and realistic management goals. Likewise, a greater understanding of the ecological role of introduced species might help to reduce controversy surrounding their purposeful use in restoration. Here we link generalizations emerging from the invasion ecology literature with practical restoration concerns, including circumstances when it is practical to use exotic species in restoration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Self-citationPositive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Cited by
Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology
Suding, K. N., Gross, K. L., & Houseman, G. R. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.005 · Cited by 1,723
Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities
Walther, G.-R., Roques, A., Hulme, P. E., Sykes, M. T., Pyšek, P., Kühn, I., Zobel, M., Bacher, S., Botta-Dukát, Z., & Bugmann, H. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.008 · Cited by 1,424
Invasive alien species in an era of globalization
Meyerson, L. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[199:iasiae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 582
Self-citationShafroth, P. B., Cleverly, J. R., Dudley, T. L., Taylor, J. P., VAN Riper, C., Weeks, E. P., & Stuart, J. N. (2005) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0099-5 · Cited by 317
Brundu, G., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.30.7015 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Antonio, C., & Meyerson, L. A.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 703-713
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2153344039
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exotic Plant Species as Problems and Solutions in Ecological Restoration: A Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2002.01051.x
- The paper
- D'Antonio, C., & Meyerson, L. A. (2002). Exotic Plant Species as Problems and Solutions in Ecological Restoration: A Synthesis. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2002.01051.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.