Cited by 69Aging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older AdultsAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Correlates of Attributing New Disability to Old Age

Open access
Sarkisian, Catherine A., Liu, Honghu, Ensrud, Kristine E., Stone, Katie L., Mangione, Carol M., For The Study of, Group, Osteoporotic Fractures Research·2001·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe women who attribute new disability to old age and to identify demographic, medical, behavioral, and psychosocial characteristics that correlate with attributing new disability to old age. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 4‐year follow‐up. SETTING: Four geographic regions of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 9704 women aged ≥67 years participating in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Of these, 657 who reported no disability at baseline but at follow‐up reported difficulty carrying out 1 or more of 13 functional activities were eligible for our analysis. MEASUREMENTS: All women reporting difficulty in any functional activity at follow‐up were asked “What is the main condition that causes you to have difficulty or prevents you from (doing the activity)?” and were shown a card listing 14 medical conditions as well as the option “old age,” from which they could choose only one response. Women attributing difficulty or inability in 1 or more functional activities to old age were classified as attributing new disability to old age. We examined the relationship between attributing new disability to old age and the following characteristics measured at baseline: age, level of education, medical comorbidity, cognitive function, body mass index (BMI), gait speed, grip strength, visual acuity, physical activity level, smoking status, social network level, and depressed mood. RESULTS: Overall, 13.5% of women attributed new disability to old age. Age was a strong independent correlate of attributing new disability to old age: compared with women age 67 to 69, the odds of attributing new disability to old age for women age 70 to 79 was 3.6 times as large (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6–8.3), and for women age 80 or over was 5.5 times as large (95% CI = 2.1–14.7). The only other characteristic that remained an independent correlate of attributing new disability to old age was grip strength; for each decile decrease in grip strength, a woman's odds of attributing new disability to old age increased by 9% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Despite great advances in geriatric medicine, old age is still perceived as a causal agent in functional decline, especially among our oldest patients. Further study is needed to determine whether, how often, and under what circumstances older adults who attribute new disability to old age have medical conditions amenable to interventions that could preserve their functioning and improve their quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49033.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beliefs that it is normal to be anxious and depressed in old age are a specific barrier to help seeking for older adults.

    “specific barriers for older adults include difficulties with transportation, beliefs that it is normal to be anxious and depressed in old age, and beliefs by referrers that psychological therapy is less likely to be effective.”

    From Barriers to treatment for older adults seeking psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Sarkisian et al., 2001

    The passage labeled Abstract says older adults who attribute physical symptoms or disability to old age may use health services less often. It does not establish that believing anxiety or depression is normal in old age is a specific barrier to seeking help for those conditions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The belief that depression and anxiety are normal aspects of ageing is a potential barrier to help seeking.

    “Another potential barrier to help seeking is the belief that depression and anxiety are normal aspects of ageing.”

    From Barriers to treatment for older adults seeking psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Sarkisian et al., 2001

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says older adults who attribute physical symptoms or disability to old age may use health services less. This supports the general idea of an age-related attribution as a barrier to seeking care, but the paper does not establish that believing depression or anxiety is a normal part of ageing deters help seeking. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 69

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1126/science.3299702 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kart C, 1981, Elderly Patients and their Doctors, 70
  3. Leventhal EA, 1986, Age, symptom interpretation, and health behavior., J Am Geriatr Soc, 34, 185
  4. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90076-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01293.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06206.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb04066.x · DOI
  8. 10.1001/jama.1990.03440050059033 · DOI
  9. 10.2105/AJPH.74.12.1374 · DOI
  10. Fitti JE, 1987, The supplement on aging to the 1984 national health interview survey., Vital & Health Statistics-series 1: Programs & collection procedures, 21, 1
  11. 10.1002/art.1780261107 · DOI
  12. Shaver KG, 1975, An Introduction to Attribution Processes
  13. Stoeckle JD, 1980, The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine, 223
  14. 10.1037/0278-6133.2.2.167 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/geronj/40.5.569 · DOI
  16. 10.1037//0278-6133.6.6.495 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0033291700030026 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/bmj.318.7181.436 · DOI
  19. Leventhal H, 1984, A Handbook of Psychology and Health, 219
  20. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Teng EL, 1987, The Modified Mini‐Mental State (3MS) examination., J Clin Psychiatry, 48, 314
  22. Lohman TG, 1988, Anthropomorphic Standardization Reference Manual, 39
  23. 10.1097/00006324-197611000-00006 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90062-2 · DOI
  25. La Porte RE, 1985, Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: Problems and prospects., Public Health Rev, 100, 131
  26. 10.1097/00003727-198811000-00008 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1300/J018v05n01_09 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/fampra/11.3.260 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06217.x · DOI
  31. Hosmer DW, 1989, Applied Logistic Regression
  32. SAS Institute, Inc, 1998, SAS Software System, Version 6.12
  33. 10.1093/geronj/43.2.M25 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06944.x · DOI
  35. 10.1056/NEJM199804093381512 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116746 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07161.x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sarkisian, C. A., Liu, H., Ensrud, K. E., Stone, K. L., Mangione, C. M., of, F. T. S., & Group, O. F. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
134-141
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2082313058
Cited by
69
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-05407)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR 35582, R01AR035582, AR35594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
women, old age, functional decline, grip strength, ageism, functional activity, cognitive function, social networks, depression, osteoporotic fractures, physical activity, body mass index, walking speed, visual acuity, comorbidities, oldest old, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, women's health
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Educational Status, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Surveys, Humans, Maryland, Minnesota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Support, Women, Geriatric Assessment, Comorbidity, Women's Health, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review