The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifocal Glasses Impair Edge‐Contrast Sensitivity and Depth Perception and Increase the Risk of Falls in Older People
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which multifocal glasses impair contrast sensitivity and depth perception at critical distances required for detecting hazards in the environment and whether multifocal glasses use increases the risk of falls in older people. DESIGN: One‐year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Falls Laboratory, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty‐six community‐dwelling people aged 63–90. MEASUREMENTS: Contrast sensitivity, depth perception, accidental falls. RESULTS: Eighty‐seven subjects (55.8%) were regular wearers of multifocal (bifocal, trifocal, or progressive lens) glasses. These subjects performed significantly worse in the distant depth perception and distant edge‐contrast sensitivity tests in conditions that forced them to view test stimuli through the lower segments of their glasses. Multifocal glasses wearers were more than twice as likely to fall in the follow‐up period than nonmultifocal glasses wearers (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06–4.92), when adjusting for age, poor vision, reduced lower limb sensation and strength, slow reaction time, and increased postural sway. Multifocal glasses wearers were also more likely to fall because of a trip (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.08–7.22), when outside their homes (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.14–5.70), and when walking up or down stairs ( P < . 01). The population attributable risks of regular multifocal glasses use were 35.2% for any falls, 40.9% for falls due to a trip, and 40.9% for falls outside the home. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that multifocal glasses impair depth perception and edge‐contrast sensitivity at critical distances for detecting obstacles in the environment. Older people may benefit from wearing nonmultifocal glasses when negotiating stairs and in unfamiliar settings outside the home.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.
BRUZZI, P., GREEN, S. B., BYAR, D. P., BRINTON, L. A., & SCHAIRER, C. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174 · Cited by 1,214
Cited by
Visual loss and falls: a review
Dhital, A., Pey, T., & Stanford, M. R. (2010) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2010.60 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, S. R., Dayhew, J., Sc, B. A., & Howland, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1760-1766
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1988635781
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifocal Glasses Impair Edge‐Contrast Sensitivity and Depth Perception and Increase the Risk of Falls in Older People. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x
- The paper
- Lord, S. R., Dayhew, J., Sc, B. A., & Howland, A. (2002). Multifocal Glasses Impair Edge‐Contrast Sensitivity and Depth Perception and Increase the Risk of Falls in Older People. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.