The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of a standardized approach for assessing life‐space mobility (the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life‐Space Assessment (LSA)) and its ability to detect changes in life‐space over time in community‐dwelling older adults. Design: Prospective, observational cohort study. Setting: Five counties (three rural and two urban) in central Alabama. Participants: Community‐dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N=306; 46% male, 43% African American) who completed in‐home baseline interviews and 2‐week and 6‐month telephone follow‐up interviews. Measurements: The LSA assessed the range, independence, and frequency of movement over the 4 weeks preceding assessments. Correlations between the baseline LSA and measures of physical and mental health (physical performance, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a global measure of health (the short form‐12 question survey), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and comorbidities) established validity. Follow‐up LSA scores established short‐term test‐retest reliability and the ability of the LSA to detect change. Results: For all LSA scoring methods, baseline and 2‐week follow‐up LSA correlations were greater than 0.86 (95% confidence interval=0.82–0.97). Highest correlations with measures of physical performance and function were noted for the LSA scoring method considering all attributes of mobility. The LSA showed both increases and decreases at 6 months. Discussion: Life‐space correlated with observed physical performance and self‐reported function. It was stable over a 2‐week period yet showed changes at 6 months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792
Sheikh (1986) · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_09 · Cited by 7,236
Cited by
The Frailty Syndrome: Definition and Natural History
Xue, Q.-L. (2011) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.009 · Cited by 2,061
The Underrecognized Epidemic of Low Mobility During Hospitalization of Older Adults
Brown, C. J., Redden, D. T., Flood, K. L., & Allman, R. M. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02393.x · Cited by 686
Self-citationLocher, J. L., Ritchie, C. S., Roth, D. L., Baker, P. S., Bodner, E. V., & Allman, R. M. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.023 · Cited by 373
Self-citationMobility Limitation in the Older Patient: A Clinical Review
Brown, C. J., & Flood, K. L. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.276566 · Cited by 287
Brown, C. J., Foley, K. T., Lowman, J. D., MacLennan, P. A., Razjouyan, J., Najafi, B., Locher, J., & Allman, R. M. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1870 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, P. S., Bodner, E. V., & Allman, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1610-1614
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2100987110
- Cited by
- 951
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x
- The paper
- Baker, P. S., Bodner, E. V., & Allman, R. M. (2003). Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.