Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 951

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults

Baker, Patricia S., Bodner, Eric V., Allman, Richard M.·2003·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the validity and reliability of a standardized approach for assessing life‐space mobility (the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life‐Space Assessment (LSA)) and its ability to detect changes in life‐space over time in community‐dwelling older adults. Design: Prospective, observational cohort study. Setting: Five counties (three rural and two urban) in central Alabama. Participants: Community‐dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (N=306; 46% male, 43% African American) who completed in‐home baseline interviews and 2‐week and 6‐month telephone follow‐up interviews. Measurements: The LSA assessed the range, independence, and frequency of movement over the 4 weeks preceding assessments. Correlations between the baseline LSA and measures of physical and mental health (physical performance, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, a global measure of health (the short form‐12 question survey), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and comorbidities) established validity. Follow‐up LSA scores established short‐term test‐retest reliability and the ability of the LSA to detect change. Results: For all LSA scoring methods, baseline and 2‐week follow‐up LSA correlations were greater than 0.86 (95% confidence interval=0.82–0.97). Highest correlations with measures of physical performance and function were noted for the LSA scoring method considering all attributes of mobility. The LSA showed both increases and decreases at 6 months. Discussion: Life‐space correlated with observed physical performance and self‐reported function. It was stable over a 2‐week period yet showed changes at 6 months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 951

Metadata

Authors
Baker, P. S., Bodner, E. V., & Allman, R. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-24
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1610-1614
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2100987110
Cited by
951
References
2
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x
The paper
Baker, P. S., Bodner, E. V., & Allman, R. M. (2003). Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51512.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.