Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical significance of RBC alloantibodies and autoantibodies in sickle cell patients who received transfusions

Aygun, Banu, Padmanabhan, Savitri, Paley, Carole, Chandrasekaran, Visalam·2002·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of alloimmunization to RBC antigens in sickle cell patients was analyzed by a retrospective review of the records of pediatric and adult sickle cell patients who received transfusions and who were followed over a 10‐year period. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Charts of pediatric and adult sickle cell patients followed at Schneider Children's Hospital (SCH) and Long Island Jewish Medical Center between 1989 and 1999 were retrieved. Patients followed at SCH were classified as pediatric, regardless of age. Data on transfusion history, alloimmunization, and transfusion reactions from 1990 were retrieved from computerized blood bank records. Transfusion history, development of alloantibodies and autoantibodies, and transfusion reactions were correlated with clinical evidence of hemolysis or other adverse reactions from the charts. All patients received ABO‐ and Rh‐compatible blood transfusions for which a partial or extended antigen match was not performed. RESULTS: Among pediatric patients, 29 percent developed clinically significant alloantibodies, and 8 percent developed autoantibodies. Seven patients developed delayed hemo‐ lytic and/or serologic transfusion reactions, two with hyperhemolysis, two with clinical evidence of hemolysis, and three with serologic evidence only. The two patients with hyperhemolysis had received extended antigen‐matched RBC transfusions to provide blood compatible with their existing antibodies. Among adult patients, 47.0 percent developed significant alloantibodies, and 9.7 percent developed autoantibodies. Five incidences of delayed hemolytic and/or serologic transfusion reactions occurred, one with hyperhemolysis and four with serologic evidence only. CONCLUSION: The alloimmunization rate is 29 percent in pediatric and 47 percent in adult sickle cell patients when partial or extended RBC antigen match is not performed. However, the delayed serologic and/or hemolytic transfusion reactions did not result in severe clinical outcome in most instances. The most important adverse event was hyperhemolysis, which may be triggered by a transfusion, but was not prevented by matching for RBC antigens. In most instances, the cause of hyperhemolysis was multifactorial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00007.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Aygun, B., Padmanabhan, S., Paley, C., & Chandrasekaran, V.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W2115169225
Cited by
355
References
5
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical significance of RBC alloantibodies and autoantibodies in sickle cell patients who received transfusions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00007.x
The paper
Aygun, B., Padmanabhan, S., Paley, C., & Chandrasekaran, V. (2002). Clinical significance of RBC alloantibodies and autoantibodies in sickle cell patients who received transfusions. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00007.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.