The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model Misspecification and Underdiversification
Abstract
In this paper, we study intertemporal portfolio choice when an investor accounts explicitly for model misspecification. We develop a framework that allows for ambiguity about not just the joint distribution of returns for all stocks in the portfolio, but also for different levels of ambiguity for the marginal distribution of returns for any subset of these stocks. We find that when the overall ambiguity about the joint distribution of returns is high, then small differences in ambiguity for the marginal return distribution will result in a portfolio that is significantly underdiversified relative to the standard mean‐variance portfolio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model
Merton, R. C. (1973) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913811 · Cited by 6,508
Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model
Merton, R. C. (1971) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-x · Cited by 5,958
Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913837 · Cited by 5,014
Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913778 · Cited by 4,262
Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios
Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00181 · Cited by 2,870
On estimating the expected return on the market
Merton, R. C. (1980) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(80)90007-0 · Cited by 2,806
Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets
French, K., & Poterba, J. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3609 · Cited by 2,512
Huberman, G. (2001) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/14.3.659 · Cited by 1,910
How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades
Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00355 · Cited by 1,667
Cited by
Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns
(2012) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7618 · Cited by 404
Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach
Garlappi, L., Wang, T., & Uppal, R. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.671981 · Cited by 264
Self-citationFear of the Unknown: Familiarity and Economic Decisions
Cao, H. H., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D., & Zhang, H. H. (2011) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfp023 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Uppal, R., & Wang, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2465-2486
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W3123868759
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 17.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model Misspecification and Underdiversification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00612.x
- The paper
- Uppal, R., & Wang, T. (2003). Model Misspecification and Underdiversification. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00612.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.