Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pediatric Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry Success, Fluoroscopy Time, and Complication Rate for Supraventricular Tachycardia: Comparison of Early and Recent Eras

KUGLER, JOHN D., DANFORD, DAVID A., HOUSTON, KRIS A., FELIX, GARY·2002·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Ablation Outcomes for Supraventricular Tachycardia. Introduction: To assess changes of success rate, fluoroscopy time, and complication rate for six supraventricular tachycardia pathways/mechanisms, data from the Pediatric Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry were grouped into two eras (1991–1995; 1996–1999). Methods and Results: Data from the early era and the late era were compared using the Chi‐square test for the outcomes of success rate and complication rate and using the Student's t‐test for the outcome of mean fluoroscopy time. In the Registry as a whole, ablation failure rates fell from 9.6% in the early era to 4.8% in the recent era, a reduction of 50% overall. Improved success rates were found for posterior septal, right free‐wall, and left free‐wall pathways and for AV nodal reentry, whereas anterior septal pathways and atrial ectopic‐focus tachycardia did not show improvement. Mean fluoroscopy time overall decreased 21% from 50.9 ± 39.9 minutes to 40.1 ± 35.1 minutes. Individually, the improvement in fluoroscopy time was found for all but the atrial ectopic‐focus tachycardia mechanism. The complication rate decreased from 4.2% to 3.0%, with significant decreases for left free‐wall and posterior septal pathways. Conclusion: Patient selection strategies to optimize radiofrequency ablation outcomes in children, which have been based on the previously published Registry data, should be reconsidered in light of these new, updated data. The lack of uniform improvement provides the impetus for further research and development of new approaches and technologic advances so that further improvement can be achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00336.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
KUGLER, J. D., DANFORD, D. A., HOUSTON, K. A., & FELIX, G.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
336-341
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1982748277
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pediatric Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry Success, Fluoroscopy Time, and Complication Rate for Supraventricular Tachycardia: Comparison of Early and Recent Eras. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00336.x
The paper
KUGLER, J. D., DANFORD, D. A., HOUSTON, K. A., & FELIX, G. (2002). Pediatric Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry Success, Fluoroscopy Time, and Complication Rate for Supraventricular Tachycardia: Comparison of Early and Recent Eras. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00336.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.