Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective Assessment after Pediatric Cardiac Ablation: Demographics, Medical Profiles, and Initial Outcomes

VAN HARE, GEORGE F., JAVITZ, HAROLD, CARMELLI, DORIT, SAUL, J. PHILIP, TANEL, RONN E., FISCHBACH, PETER S., KANTER, RONALD J., SCHAFFER, MICHAEL, DUNNIGAN, ANN, COLAN, STEVEN, SERWER, GERALD, Participating Members of the Pediatric Electrophysiology Society·2004·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Introduction: A multicenter prospective study was designed and implemented to assess the short‐ and longer‐term results and risks associated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation in children. Methods and Results: Patients recruited for the study were aged 0 to 16 years with supraventricular tachycardia due to accessory pathways or AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), excluding patients with nontrivial congenital heart disease. A national registry also was established, and contributing centers were encouraged to enroll all pediatric patients, aged 0 to 21 years, undergoing ablation at their center. This report summarizes acute results of these procedures. For analysis, subjects were divided into three groups: the prospective cohort (n = 481), cohort‐eligible registry participants (n = 504), and not cohort eligible registry participants (n = 1,776). Prospectively enrolled cohort patients were similar to cohort‐eligible patients in terms of demographic and other patient characteristics. Overall success rates for RF ablation were high (95.7%), with higher success rates for left‐sided and particularly left free‐wall pathways (97.8%) than right free‐wall pathways (90.8%). Complications of both electrophysiologic study and RF ablation were infrequent (4.2% and 4.0%, respectively), and there were no deaths. AV block was uncommon overall (1.2%) and was limited to ablation in AVNRT (2.1%) and septal accessory pathways (3.0%). Conclusion: Despite the multicenter and prospective design, the study demonstrates high success rates and low complication rates, which are comparable to prior single‐center retrospective studies. These results may serve as the current best benchmark for expected results in the pediatric population, aged 0 to 16 years, both in terms of acute success rates and the occurrence of complications. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 759‐770, July 2004)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03645.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
VAN HARE, G. F., JAVITZ, H., CARMELLI, D., SAUL, J. P., TANEL, R. E., FISCHBACH, P. S., KANTER, R. J., SCHAFFER, M., DUNNIGAN, A., COLAN, S., SERWER, G., & Participating Members of the Pediatric Electrophysiology Society
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
759-770
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2168129496
Cited by
367
References
1
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.