The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Host‐plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants
Open accessAbstract
Seven hypotheses, including the ‘Resource Concentration Hypothesis’ and the ‘Enemies Hypothesis’, have been put forward to explain why fewer specialist insects are found on host plants growing in diverse backgrounds than on similar plants growing in bare soil. All seven hypotheses are discussed and discounted, primarily because no one has used any of them to produce a general theory of host plant selection, they still remain as hypotheses. However, we have developed a general theory based on detailed observations of insect behaviour. Our theory is based on the fact that during host plant finding the searching insects land indiscriminately on green objects such as the leaves of host plants (appropriate landings) and non‐host plants (inappropriate landings), but avoid landing on brown surfaces, such as soil. The complete system of host plant selection involves a three‐link chain of events in which the first link is governed by cues from volatile plant chemicals, the central link by visual stimuli, and the final link by cues from non‐volatile plant chemicals. The previously ‘missing’ central link, which is based on what we have described as ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’, is governed by visual stimuli. Our theory explains why attempts to show that olfaction is the crucial component in the central link of host plant selection proved intractable. The ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ theory is discussed to indicate the type of work needed in future studies to improve our understanding of how intercropping, undersowing and companion planting can be used to optimum effect in crop protection. The new theory is used also to suggest how insect biotypes could develop and to describe why pest insects do not decimate wild host plants growing in ‘natural’ situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Use of Push-Pull Strategies in Integrated Pest Management
Cook, S. M., Khan, Z. R., & Pickett, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407 · Cited by 1,572
Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review
Letourneau, D. K., Armbrecht, I., Rivera, B. S., Lerma, J. M., Carmona, E. J., Daza, M. C., Escobar, S., Galindo, V., Gutiérrez, C., López, S. D., et al. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/09-2026.1 · Cited by 888
Habitat Management to Suppress Pest Populations: Progress and Prospects
Gurr, G. M., Wratten, S. D., Landis, D. A., & You, M. (2017) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035050 · Cited by 699
Kaplan, I., & Denno, R. F. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01093.x · Cited by 673
Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move
Dingle, H. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640386.001.0001 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Finch, S., & Collier, R. H.
- Venue
- Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-102
- ISSN
- 0013-8703 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-7458
- OpenAlex
- W1970743615
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host‐plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00684.x
- The paper
- Finch, S., & Collier, R. H. (2000). Host‐plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00684.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.