The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting mitochondrial DNA quality from museum preserved Drosophila simulans
Abstract
In this study we investigate how traditional killing methods and storage regimes affected mitochondrial DNA quality in Drosophila simulans. Here we define quality with three criteria: (1) size of extracted DNA, (2) extraction yield, and (3) ability to amplify from four target regions. Killing methods had a significant effect on extraction yield, but not on PCR success. Highest DNA yields were extracted from specimens exposed to cyanide, while the lowest were from specimens killed in 70% ethanol. Specimens stored for two years contained badly sheared DNA, which translated into a significant decrease in PCR success compared to freshly assayed specimens. The most dramatic decrease in PCR success occurred in the 1822 bp and 1332 bp amplicons, compared to the 959 bp and 291 bp fragments. Naphthalene did not affect any aspect of DNA quality; time of storage affected PCR success regardless of naphthalene environment. This study serves to further refine our understanding of DNA degradation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rum or 70% ethanol is not an adequate long-term preservative for DNA diagnostics.
“Note that rum or 70% ethanol is not an adequate long-term preservative for DNA diagnostics (Dean et al. , 2001; Vink et al. , 2005)”
From Collection techniques for the analyses of pathogens in crustaceans (2017) · cites this paper as Dean et al. , 2001
Citations
Cites
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collection techniques for the analyses of pathogens in crustaceans
Shields, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Crustacean Biology · doi:10.1093/jcbiol/rux077 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, M. D., & Ballard, J. W. O.
- Affiliations
- Field Museum of Natural History (US)
- Venue
- Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-283
- ISSN
- 0013-8703 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-7458
- OpenAlex
- W1970835031
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- La Trobe University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Keywords
- Drosophila simulans, museum specimens, DNA degradation, sample preservation, killing methods, PCR amplification success, DNA shearing, naphthalene, storage time, cyanide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review