The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ZigBee and Bluetooth: strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications
Abstract
Most industry analysts are forecasting explosive growth in the use of wireless data network technologies in industrial applications. For both ZigBee and Bluetooth separate alliances of companies worked to develop specifications covering the network/link, security and application profile layers so that the commercial potential of the standards could be realized. Real industrial wireless networks are inevitably be hybrids including ZigBee/802.15.4 and Bluetooth in complementary roles that suit the characteristics of each. The key to success is in deploying the right wireless technologies for the requirements of the application and avoiding the temptation of trying to make one technology meet all needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi
Lee, J.-S., Su, Y.-W., & Shen, C.-C. (2007) · IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · doi:10.1109/iecon.2007.4460126 · Cited by 1,050
Automated Irrigation System Using a Wireless Sensor Network and GPRS Module
Gutierrez, J., Villa-Medina, J. F., Nieto-Garibay, A., & Porta-Gandara, M. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2013.2276487 · Cited by 914
Comparative Examination on Architecture and Protocol of Industrial Wireless Sensor Network Standards
Wang, Q., & Jiang, J. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2548360 · Cited by 182
Wireless technologies for implantable devices
Nelson, B. D., Karipott, S. S., Wang, Y., & Ong, K. G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20164604 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, N.
- Venue
- Computing and Control Engineering
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 0956-3385 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0460
- OpenAlex
- W2081380202
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ZigBee and Bluetooth: strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/cce:20050204
- The paper
- Baker, N. (2005). ZigBee and Bluetooth: strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications. Computing and Control Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1049/cce%3A20050204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
