Cited by 6Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringCryptographic Implementations and Security

FPGA Realization of a Novel Hyperchaos Augmented Image Encryption Algorithm

Open access
Alexan, Wassim, Elshabasy, Noura H., Mamdouh, Eyad, Osama, Remas, Abd El Ghany, Mohamed A., El-Damak, Dina·2026·IET Computers & Digital Techniques

Abstract

With the rapid growth of multimedia communication, protecting image data has become increasingly critical. This article proposes a novel 3‐stage hyperchaos‐based augmented image encryption technique (3SHAIET) that utilizes a three‐stage process with chaotic systems of increasing dimensionality (e.g., six‐dimensional [6D], 8D, and 9D) to enhance security against cryptographic attacks. At each stage, the image is converted into a 1D bit‐stream array, encrypted using dynamically generated S‐boxes, and XORed with keys derived from the chaotic systems, ensuring high sensitivity to initial conditions and strong diffusion and confusion properties. To achieve real‐time performance, the algorithm is realized on a field‐programmable gate array (FPGA), leveraging hardware acceleration for the lowest possible latency encryption. The FPGA realization is shown to provide a 165 times improvement in encryption rate over its corresponding software implementation. Experimental results demonstrate the algorithm’s robustness, with an extremely large key space of 2 5475 and resistance to statistical (PSNR of 8.11 dB, MAE of 81.74, and entropy of 7.999) and differential attacks (NPCR of 99.6216% and UACI of 32.0534%). Additionally, the resulting encrypted images’ bit‐streams successfully pass all National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) randomness tests, further validating the algorithm’s security. These results make the proposed 3SHAIET algorithm a highly efficient and secure solution for modern multimedia systems. The objective of 3SHAIET is to jointly maximize cryptographic strength (via multistage hyperchaotic keys and dynamic S‐boxes) and real‐time efficiency (via FPGA realization) for secure multimedia transmission and storage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/cdt2/6416727

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexan, W., Elshabasy, N. H., Mamdouh, E., Osama, R., Abd El Ghany, M. A., & El-Damak, D.
Affiliations
German University in Cairo (EG)
Corresponding author
Alexan, Wassim
Venue
IET Computers & Digital Techniques
Published
2026-01
Volume
2026
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1751-8601 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-861X
OpenAlex
W7130652750
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IET Computers & Digital Techniques (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Keywords
image encryption, hyperchaos, FPGA acceleration, dynamic S-box, chaotic systems, real-time encryption, differential attack resistance, statistical attack resistance, key space, multimedia security, NIST randomness tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review