The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parallel operation of high power IGBTs
Abstract
The paper shows third generation IGBTs behaviour and matching when connected in parallel. Test results give the actual current sharing between modules with different case temperature, Vcesat and wiring inductances. In the case of strong Vcesat or temperature differences it can be seen there is no catastrophic current mismatching. For inductive loads, the paper presents IGBT switching waveforms and summarises recommendations for parallelling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The non-idealities and asymmetry affecting the dynamic unbalancing are threshold voltage (VG,th), gate signal propagation delay (td,on; td,off), rise time and fall time of the gate signal (tr; tf), gate resistance (RG), device parasitic capacitances, total power loop inductance, and gate loop inductance [18][19][20][21].”
From Paralleling of IGBT Power Semiconductor Devices and Reliability Issues (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cited by
Paralleling of IGBT Power Semiconductor Devices and Reliability Issues
Tripathi, R. N., & Omura, I. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12183826 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Medaule, D.
- Venue
- IEE Colloquium on `IGBT Propulsion Drives'
- Publisher
- IEE
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 1995
- Pages
- 2-2
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
