The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-sufficiency and lifetime improvement of community BESS on an LVDC backbone compared to individual BESS
Abstract
Previous analyses on the benefits of LVDC backbones have exposed the huge potential in urban environment with high PV penetration. However, the energy efficiency and lifetime improvement by integrating a community battery energy storage systems (BESS) on an LVDC backbone have not been thoroughly investigated yet. In this contri-bution multiple comparisons are made between individual and virtual community BESS on LVAC and real community BESS on LVDC. It has been shown that the reduced con-version loss and the slight lifetime improvement are the main advantages of community BESS on LVDC compared to individual BESS on LVAC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This strategy rethinks the smart grid set up and contributes to slowing loops by reducing energy conversion losses and extending equipment lifespan [42].”
From Smart, circular and renewable: The role of cooperative governance in accelerating a sustainable energy transition (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Opstal, W., Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104049 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Azaioud, H., Claeys, R., Knockaert, J., Vandevelde, L., & Desmet, J.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University, Belgium
- Venue
- IET Conference Proceedings
- Published
- 2023-07-04
- Volume
- 2023
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2099-2103
- ISSN
- 2732-4494
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
