Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Network Security and Intrusion DetectionVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Deep network approach with stacked sparse autoencoders in detection of DDoS attacks on SDN‐based VANET

Polat, Huseyin, Turkoglu, Muammer, Polat, Onur·2020·IET Communications
DOI 10.1049/iet-com.2020.0477
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Software‐defined network (SDN)‐based vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is an outstanding technology for smart transportation as it increases traffic safety, efficiency, comfort, and manageability. However, despite all its benefits and good performance, SDN‐based VANET is vulnerable to attack threats such as distributed denial of service (DDoS). When SDN‐based VANET systems are exposed to DDoS attacks, this may affect traffic safety, causing traffic accidents and deaths. Therefore, the relevant security threats need to be addressed before integrating the SDN‐based VANETs into smart transportation systems. In this study, the stacked sparse autoencoder (SSAE) + Softmax classifier deep network model is proposed to detect DDoS attacks targeting SDN‐based VANETs. The features in the dataset obtained from the SDN‐based VANET were reduced dimensionally utilising SSAE, and the most significant features were obtained. Then, these features were used as input into the Softmax classifier. According to the experimental results, the best accuracy scores were calculated as 96.9% using the four‐layer SSAE + Softmax classifier deep network model proposed. When compared, the results demonstrate the SSAE + Softmax classifier deep network model proposed can obtain better results in the classification of DDoS attacks and is more successful than the other machine learning classifiers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-com.2020.0477

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1016/j.future.2019.10.020 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.011 · DOI
  3. Boucetta S.I., 2017, Survey on software defined vanets, Gradus, 4, 272
  4. 10.1007/BF03391543 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.comcom.2015.06.004 · DOI
  6. Cabaj K. Wytrebowicz J. Kuklinski S. et al.: ‘SDN architecture impact on network security’.FedCSIS Position Papers Warsaw Poland September2014 pp.143–148 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11036-016-0676-x · DOI
  8. 10.1155/2018/8631851 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2854567 · DOI
  10. Zhao N., 2019, Consortium blockchain‐based secure software defined vehicular network, Mobile Netw. Appl., 25, 1
  11. 10.1002/dac.3497 · DOI
  12. 10.26555/ijain.v4i1.138 · DOI
  13. 10.2298/CSIS170328044M · DOI
  14. Niyaz Q. Sun W. Javaid A. Y. et al.: ‘A deep learning based DDoS detection system in software‐defined networking (SDN)’ arXiv preprint arXiv: 1611.07400 · arXiv
  15. Tang T. A. Mhamdi L. McLernon D. et al.: ‘Deep learning approach for network intrusion detection in software defined networking’.Int. Conf. on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications Fez Morocco October2016 pp.258–263 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976908 · DOI
  17. Tang T.A., 2020, DeepIDS: deep learning approach for intrusion detection in software defined networking, Electronics. (Basel), 9, 1533
  18. 10.3390/sym12010007 · DOI
  19. Ko I., 2020, Adaptable feature‐selecting and threshold‐moving complete autoencoder for DDoS flood attack mitigation, J. Inf. Secur. Appl., 55, 102647
  20. 10.1016/j.future.2019.10.015 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3014870 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107792 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2973176 · DOI
  24. Le Q.V., 2015, A tutorial on deep learning part 2: autoencoders, convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks, 1
  25. Le Q.V Ngiam J. Coates A. et al.: ‘On optimization methods for deep learning’.Proc. of the 28th Int. Conf. on Int. Conf. on Machine Learning Washington USA July‐June2011 pp.265–272
  26. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2706363 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.dsp.2017.09.005 · DOI
  28. Bengio Y. Lamblin P. Popovici D. et al.: ‘Greedy layer‐wise training of deep networks’.Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems Vancouver Canada December2006 pp.153–160 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3390/app8071126 · DOI
  30. 10.25046/aj030111 · DOI
  31. Caliskan A. Badem H. Basturk A. et al.: ‘A comparative study on classification by deep learning’.National Conf. on Electrical Electronics and Biomedical Engineering Bursa Turkey December2016 pp.503–506
  32. 10.1016/j.cegh.2018.12.004 · DOI
  33. Abbas M.T., 2019, SD‐IoV: SDN enabled routing for internet of vehicles in road‐aware approach, J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 11, 1
  34. 10.1007/s11276-019-02077-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Polat, H., Turkoglu, M., & Polat, O.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Engineering Faculty of Technology Gazi University Ankara 06500 Turkey
  • Department of Computer Engineering Bingol University Bingol 12400 Turkey
  • Gazi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Polat, Onur
ORCID
Venue
IET Communications
Publisher
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
Published
2020-12
Volume
14
Issue
22
Pages
4089-4100
ISSN
  • 1751-8628 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8636
DOI
10.1049/iet-com.2020.0477
OpenAlex
W3131556260
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 77 d)
Locations
IET Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
DDoS attack detection, software-defined networking, vehicular ad hoc networks, stacked sparse autoencoder, softmax classifier, deep learning, dimensionality reduction, network security, smart transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.