Cited by 22Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureOptimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid Energy Management

Autonomous plug and play electric vehicle charging scenarios including reactive power provision: A probabilistic load flow analysis

Melhorn, Alexander C., McKenna, Killian, Keane, Andrew, Flynn, Damian, Dimitrovski, Aleksandar·2017·IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

Abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) charging can have various impacts on low‐voltage distribution systems, along with increasing the uncertainty of network load levels. One method for capturing the statistical uncertainty is probabilistic load flow (PLF). A primary concern of such an approach is determining the correlation between the input variables. Since data are limited, a 1 min resolution bottom‐up time‐variant load model, capturing the changing voltage dependencies of the load, is used for modelling household electrical demand to provide pseudo‐meter data for the three‐phase PLF analysis of a residential distribution network. The correlation between the household and EV charging loads are implicitly taken into account by modelling the EV plug‐in and departure times with the corresponding occupancy model. Two autonomous plug‐and‐play charging scenarios are compared with a standard charging arrangement at both unity and 0.95 capacitive power factors. Four different PLF input correlation scenarios, varying from fully correlated to fully independent, are considered. The proposed charging scenarios and reactive power provision reduce the likelihood of system voltage violations introduced by EVs. The PLF results are verified against those from the initial time‐series analysis providing valuable insight into the uncertainty introduced by EVs and the correlation between household and EV loads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0652

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melhorn, A. C., McKenna, K., Keane, A., Flynn, D., & Dimitrovski, A.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Melhorn, Alexander C.
Venue
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Published
2017-02
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
768-775
ISSN
  • 1751-8687 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8695
OpenAlex
W2530525596
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IET Generation Transmission & Distribution (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (09/SRC/E1780)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC0500OR22725)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, reactive power support, probabilistic load flow, low-voltage distribution networks, voltage violation, three-phase distribution systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review