Autonomous plug and play electric vehicle charging scenarios including reactive power provision: A probabilistic load flow analysis
Abstract
Electric vehicle (EV) charging can have various impacts on low‐voltage distribution systems, along with increasing the uncertainty of network load levels. One method for capturing the statistical uncertainty is probabilistic load flow (PLF). A primary concern of such an approach is determining the correlation between the input variables. Since data are limited, a 1 min resolution bottom‐up time‐variant load model, capturing the changing voltage dependencies of the load, is used for modelling household electrical demand to provide pseudo‐meter data for the three‐phase PLF analysis of a residential distribution network. The correlation between the household and EV charging loads are implicitly taken into account by modelling the EV plug‐in and departure times with the corresponding occupancy model. Two autonomous plug‐and‐play charging scenarios are compared with a standard charging arrangement at both unity and 0.95 capacitive power factors. Four different PLF input correlation scenarios, varying from fully correlated to fully independent, are considered. The proposed charging scenarios and reactive power provision reduce the likelihood of system voltage violations introduced by EVs. The PLF results are verified against those from the initial time‐series analysis providing valuable insight into the uncertainty introduced by EVs and the correlation between household and EV loads.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A massive presence of electric vehicles may endanger the operation of distribution systems.
“A massive presence of electric vehicles may endanger the operation of distribution systems [1].”
From Integration of Electric Vehicles in Low-Voltage Distribution Networks Considering Voltage Management (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integration of Electric Vehicles in Low-Voltage Distribution Networks Considering Voltage Management
Carrión, M., Zárate-Miñano, R., & Domínguez, R. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13164125 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“A massive presence of electric vehicles may endanger the operation of distribution systems [1].”
Background
- Authors
- Melhorn, A. C., McKenna, K., Keane, A., Flynn, D., & Dimitrovski, A.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Melhorn, Alexander C.
- Venue
- IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 768-775
- ISSN
- 1751-8687 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8695
- OpenAlex
- W2530525596
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IET Generation Transmission & Distribution (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (09/SRC/E1780)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC0500OR22725)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Keywords
- electric vehicle charging, reactive power support, probabilistic load flow, low-voltage distribution networks, voltage violation, three-phase distribution systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review