Cited by 221Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesRadiation Effects in ElectronicsGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials

Review and analysis of SiC MOSFETs’ ruggedness and reliability

Open access
Wang, Jun, Jiang, Xi·2020·IET Power Electronics

Abstract

SiC MOSFETs (silicon carbide metal‐oxide semiconductor field‐effect transistors) are replacing Si insulated gate bipolar transistors in many power conversion applications due to their superior performance. However, ruggedness and reliability of SiC MOSFETs are still big concern for their widespread applications in the market, especially in safety‐critical applications. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive picture on the ruggedness and reliability of commercial SiC MOSFETs, discover their failure or degradation mechanism, and propose some possible mitigation methods through both literature survey and in‐depth analysis. The ruggedness of SiC MOSFETs discussed here includes short‐circuit (SC) ruggedness, avalanche ruggedness, and their failure mechanism. The reliability issues include gate oxide reliability, degradation under high‐temperature bias stress, repetitive SC stress, avalanche stress, power cycling stress, body diode's surge current stress, and their degradation mechanism. Furthermore, this study discusses methods and solutions to improve their ruggedness and reliability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.0587

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 221

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Choyke, W.J., Matsunami, H., Pensl, G.:'Silicon carbide' (Springer Press, Germany, 2004)
  2. Schaffer, W.J., Kong, H.S., Negley, G.H., et al.: 'Hall effect and CV measurements on epitaxial 6H-and 4H-SiC'. Institute of Physics Conf. Series, Bristol, 1994, Vol. 137, pp. 155-160
  3. Fujihira, K., Tarui, Y., Imaizumi, M., et al.: 'Characteristics of 4HSiC MOS interface annealed in N 2 O', Solid-State Electron., 2005, 49, pp. 896-901
  4. Yang, L., Fayyaz, A., Castellazzi, A.: 'Characterization of highvoltage SiC MOSFETs under UIS avalanche stress'. Proc. PEMD, Manchester, UK, April 2014, pp. 1-5

Authors
Wang, J., & Jiang, X.
Affiliations
Hunan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Xi
Venue
IET Power Electronics
Published
2020-02
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
445-455
ISSN
  • 1755-4535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4543
OpenAlex
W2967146328
Cited by
221
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IET Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Keywords
SiC MOSFET, ruggedness, reliability, short-circuit ruggedness, avalanche ruggedness, failure mechanisms, gate oxide reliability, degradation mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review