Inference of missing data in photovoltaic monitoring datasets
Open accessAbstract
Photovoltaic (PV) systems are frequently covered by performance guarantees, which are often based on attaining a certain performance ratio (PR). Climatic and electrical data are collected on site to verify that these guarantees are met or that the systems are working well. However, in‐field data acquisition commonly suffers from data loss, sometimes for prolonged periods of time, making this assessment impossible or at the very best introducing significant uncertainties. This study presents a method to mitigate this issue based on back‐filling missing data. Typical cases of data loss are considered and a method to infer this is presented and validated. Synthetic performance data is generated based on interpolated environmental data and a trained empirical electrical model. A case study is subsequently used to validate the method. Accuracy of the approach is examined by creating artificial data loss in two closely monitored PV modules. A missing month of energy readings has been replenished, reproducing PR with an average daily and monthly mean bias error of about −1 and −0.02%, respectively, for a crystalline silicon module. The PR is a key property which is required for the warranty verification, and the proposed method yields reliable results in order to achieve this.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For standalone systems in isolated locations, data can be even more frequently lost due to outages, remote connection failures, inaccessibility for maintenance, limited local knowledge and a lack of local fault reporting.
“For standalone systems in isolated locations, data can be even more frequently lost due to outages (possibly caused by poor weather or high energy use), remote connection failures, inaccessibility for maintenance, limited local knowledge and a lack of local fault reporting [29].”
From Analysis of standalone solar streetlights for improved energy access in displaced settlements (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of standalone solar streetlights for improved energy access in displaced settlements
Nixon, J. D., Bhargava, K., Halford, A., & Gaura, E. (2021) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.105 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koubli, E., Palmer, D., Rowley, P., & Gottschalg, R.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Koubli, Eleni
- Venue
- IET Renewable Power Generation
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434-439
- ISSN
- 1752-1416 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1424
- OpenAlex
- W2324602164
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IET Renewable Power Generation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Research Councils UK
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K02227X/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
- Keywords
- photovoltaic system monitoring, missing data inference, performance ratio, data loss, crystalline silicon modules, energy yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review