Cited by 20Photovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

Inference of missing data in photovoltaic monitoring datasets

Open access
Koubli, Eleni, Palmer, Diane, Rowley, Paul, Gottschalg, Ralph·2016·IET Renewable Power Generation

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) systems are frequently covered by performance guarantees, which are often based on attaining a certain performance ratio (PR). Climatic and electrical data are collected on site to verify that these guarantees are met or that the systems are working well. However, in‐field data acquisition commonly suffers from data loss, sometimes for prolonged periods of time, making this assessment impossible or at the very best introducing significant uncertainties. This study presents a method to mitigate this issue based on back‐filling missing data. Typical cases of data loss are considered and a method to infer this is presented and validated. Synthetic performance data is generated based on interpolated environmental data and a trained empirical electrical model. A case study is subsequently used to validate the method. Accuracy of the approach is examined by creating artificial data loss in two closely monitored PV modules. A missing month of energy readings has been replenished, reproducing PR with an average daily and monthly mean bias error of about −1 and −0.02%, respectively, for a crystalline silicon module. The PR is a key property which is required for the warranty verification, and the proposed method yields reliable results in order to achieve this.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0355

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For standalone systems in isolated locations, data can be even more frequently lost due to outages, remote connection failures, inaccessibility for maintenance, limited local knowledge and a lack of local fault reporting.

    “For standalone systems in isolated locations, data can be even more frequently lost due to outages (possibly caused by poor weather or high energy use), remote connection failures, inaccessibility for maintenance, limited local knowledge and a lack of local fault reporting [29].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koubli, E., Palmer, D., Rowley, P., & Gottschalg, R.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Koubli, Eleni
Venue
IET Renewable Power Generation
Published
2016-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
434-439
ISSN
  • 1752-1416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1424
OpenAlex
W2324602164
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IET Renewable Power Generation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K02227X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Keywords
photovoltaic system monitoring, missing data inference, performance ratio, data loss, crystalline silicon modules, energy yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review