The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping
Abstract
Following from smaller‐scale investigations of grid‐forming converter control applied to wind turbines in 2017–2018, this study describes a much larger trial involving an entire wind farm, owned and operated by ScottishPower Renewables. To the authors’ knowledge, this was the first UK converter‐connected wind farm to operate in grid‐forming mode, and the largest in the world to date. The 23‐turbine, 69 MW farm ran in the grid‐forming mode for 6 weeks, exploring inertia contributions between H = 0.2 s and H = 8 s. A number of unscheduled frequency disturbances occurred due to interconnector, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) and other trips, to which un‐curtailed turbines were able to respond. In addition, several deliberate tests were carried out. The turbines were able to provide a stable and appropriate response at relatively high inertia levels to the frequency events commonly occurring today. The captured responses stimulated a debate as to whether external damping power might be required in a grid‐forming converter, or whether internal damping is sufficient to allow stable and robust power‐sharing with parallel devices in all grid event scenarios. Analysis in this study suggests that, practically, internal damping is probably appropriate, and that any deficiency in external damping power can be more than mitigated by reactance and/or droop‐slope response‐time management in the grid‐forming converters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Brogan P., 2019, 17th Wind Integration Workshop, 5
- Roscoe A., 2019, 18th Wind Integration Workshop, 7
- Tayyebi A., 2020, Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid‐forming power converters, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 8, 15
- 10.1109/AMPS.2016.7602853 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0352 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Roscoe, A., Knueppel, T., Da Silva, R., Brogan, P., Gutierrez, I., Elliott, D., & Perez Campion, J.
- Affiliations
- Converter Control Group, Siemens‐Gamesa Glasgow Scotland
- Grid and Regulation Analyst, ScottishPower Renewables Glasgow Scotland
- Scottish Power (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Control and Grid Integration, Iberdrola Renovables Madrid Spain
- Corresponding author
- Roscoe, Andrew
- Venue
- IET Renewable Power Generation
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3908-3917
- ISSN
- 1752-1416 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1424
- OpenAlex
- W3131742660
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IET Renewable Power Generation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- grid-forming inverters, wind farms, frequency response, inertia, internal friction, external damping, converter control, droop control, power sharing, frequency disturbance, low-inertia power systems, wind turbines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0638
- The paper
- Roscoe, A., Knueppel, T., Da Silva, R., Brogan, P., Gutierrez, I., Elliott, D., & Perez Campion, J. (2020). Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping. IET Renewable Power Generation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0638