Cited by 57Wind Turbine Control SystemsMicrogrid Control and OptimizationPower Systems and Renewable Energy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping

Roscoe, Andrew, Knueppel, Thyge, Da Silva, Ricardo, Brogan, Paul, Gutierrez, Isaac, Elliott, Douglas, Perez Campion, Juan‐Carlos·2020·IET Renewable Power Generation

Abstract

Following from smaller‐scale investigations of grid‐forming converter control applied to wind turbines in 2017–2018, this study describes a much larger trial involving an entire wind farm, owned and operated by ScottishPower Renewables. To the authors’ knowledge, this was the first UK converter‐connected wind farm to operate in grid‐forming mode, and the largest in the world to date. The 23‐turbine, 69 MW farm ran in the grid‐forming mode for 6 weeks, exploring inertia contributions between H = 0.2 s and H = 8 s. A number of unscheduled frequency disturbances occurred due to interconnector, combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) and other trips, to which un‐curtailed turbines were able to respond. In addition, several deliberate tests were carried out. The turbines were able to provide a stable and appropriate response at relatively high inertia levels to the frequency events commonly occurring today. The captured responses stimulated a debate as to whether external damping power might be required in a grid‐forming converter, or whether internal damping is sufficient to allow stable and robust power‐sharing with parallel devices in all grid event scenarios. Analysis in this study suggests that, practically, internal damping is probably appropriate, and that any deficiency in external damping power can be more than mitigated by reactance and/or droop‐slope response‐time management in the grid‐forming converters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0638

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 57

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brogan P., 2019, 17th Wind Integration Workshop, 5
  2. Roscoe A., 2019, 18th Wind Integration Workshop, 7
  3. Tayyebi A., 2020, Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid‐forming power converters, IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 8, 15
  4. 10.1109/AMPS.2016.7602853 · DOI
  5. 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0352 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Roscoe, A., Knueppel, T., Da Silva, R., Brogan, P., Gutierrez, I., Elliott, D., & Perez Campion, J.
Affiliations
  • Converter Control Group, Siemens‐Gamesa Glasgow Scotland
  • Grid and Regulation Analyst, ScottishPower Renewables Glasgow Scotland
  • Scottish Power (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Control and Grid Integration, Iberdrola Renovables Madrid Spain
Corresponding author
Roscoe, Andrew
Venue
IET Renewable Power Generation
Published
2020-12
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
3908-3917
ISSN
  • 1752-1416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1424
OpenAlex
W3131742660
Cited by
57
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IET Renewable Power Generation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Keywords
grid-forming inverters, wind farms, frequency response, inertia, internal friction, external damping, converter control, droop control, power sharing, frequency disturbance, low-inertia power systems, wind turbines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0638
The paper
Roscoe, A., Knueppel, T., Da Silva, R., Brogan, P., Gutierrez, I., Elliott, D., & Perez Campion, J. (2020). Response of a grid forming wind farm to system events, and the impact of external and internal damping. IET Renewable Power Generation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0638