Cited by 89Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Robustness analysis of biochemical network models

Kim, J., Bates, D.G., Postlethwaite, I., Ma, L., Iglesias, P.A.·2006·IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology

Abstract

Biological systems that have been experimentally verified to be robust to significant changes in their environments require mathematical models that are themselves robust. In this context, a necessary condition for model robustness is that the model dynamics should not be sensitive to small variations in the model's parameters. Robustness analysis problems of this type have been extensively studied in the field of robust control theory and have been found to be very difficult to solve in general. The authors describe how some tools from robust control theory and nonlinear optimisation can be used to analyse the robustness of a recently proposed model of the molecular network underlying adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) oscillations observed in fields of chemotactic Dictyostelium cells. The network model, which consists of a system of seven coupled nonlinear differential equations, accurately reproduces the spontaneous oscillations in cAMP observed during the early development of D. discoideum. The analysis by the authors reveals, however, that very small variations in the model parameters can effectively destroy the required oscillatory dynamics. A biological interpretation of the analysis results is that correct functioning of a particular positive feedback loop in the proposed model is crucial to maintaining the required oscillatory dynamics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/ip-syb:20050024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 19 · Cited by 89

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Laub, 1998, 9, 3521
  2. Morohashi, 2002, 216, 19
  3. Kitano, 2004, 5, 826
  4. Stelling, 2004, 118, 675
  5. Ma, 2002, 3, 38
  6. Doyle, 1982, 129, 242
  7. Skogestad, S., and Postlethwaite, I.: ‘Multivariable feedback control’, (John Wiley 1996)
  8. 10.1109/9.284879 · DOI
  9. Dailey, 1990, Proc. Amer. Control Conf., 3036
  10. Goldberg, D.E.: ‘Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning’, (Addison-Wesley 1989)
  11. Yen, 1995, Proc. 11th IEEE Conf. on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, 277, 10.1109/CAIA.1995.378811 · DOI
  12. Menon, 2004, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems
  13. Chernoff, 1952, 23, 493
  14. 10.1109/9.895560 · DOI
  15. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P.: ‘Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing’, (Cambridge University Press 1992)
  16. Kim, 1998, 197, 117
  17. Pitt, 1992, 69, 305

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., Bates, D. G., Postlethwaite, I., Ma, L., & Iglesias, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology
Published
2006
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
96
ISSN
1741-2471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092313542
Cited by
89
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Systems Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Keywords
model robustness, biochemical network models, parameter sensitivity, cAMP oscillations, Dictyostelium discoideum, chemotaxis, positive feedback loop, robust control, nonlinear differential equations, oscillatory dynamics
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Animals, Biochemistry, Biological Clocks, Cells, Cultured, Chemotaxis, Computer Simulation, Dictyostelium, Feedback, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/ip-syb:20050024
The paper
Kim, J., Bates, D. G., Postlethwaite, I., Ma, L., & Iglesias, P. A. (2006). Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-syb%3A20050024