The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Robustness analysis of biochemical network models
Abstract
Biological systems that have been experimentally verified to be robust to significant changes in their environments require mathematical models that are themselves robust. In this context, a necessary condition for model robustness is that the model dynamics should not be sensitive to small variations in the model's parameters. Robustness analysis problems of this type have been extensively studied in the field of robust control theory and have been found to be very difficult to solve in general. The authors describe how some tools from robust control theory and nonlinear optimisation can be used to analyse the robustness of a recently proposed model of the molecular network underlying adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) oscillations observed in fields of chemotactic Dictyostelium cells. The network model, which consists of a system of seven coupled nonlinear differential equations, accurately reproduces the spontaneous oscillations in cAMP observed during the early development of D. discoideum. The analysis by the authors reveals, however, that very small variations in the model parameters can effectively destroy the required oscillatory dynamics. A biological interpretation of the analysis results is that correct functioning of a particular positive feedback loop in the proposed model is crucial to maintaining the required oscillatory dynamics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The robustness of model simulations to input perturbations should also be considered, potentially including μ‐analysis, an approach to quantifying the effects of parameter uncertainty as applied to models in systems biology, for example, to ascertain the extent of applicability of the models generated.71”
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 19 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Laub, 1998, 9, 3521
- Morohashi, 2002, 216, 19
- Kitano, 2004, 5, 826
- Stelling, 2004, 118, 675
- Ma, 2002, 3, 38
- Doyle, 1982, 129, 242
- Skogestad, S., and Postlethwaite, I.: ‘Multivariable feedback control’, (John Wiley 1996)
- 10.1109/9.284879 · DOI
- Dailey, 1990, Proc. Amer. Control Conf., 3036
- Goldberg, D.E.: ‘Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning’, (Addison-Wesley 1989)
- Yen, 1995, Proc. 11th IEEE Conf. on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, 277, 10.1109/CAIA.1995.378811 · DOI
- Menon, 2004, Proc. IEEE Conf. on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems
- Chernoff, 1952, 23, 493
- 10.1109/9.895560 · DOI
- Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P.: ‘Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing’, (Cambridge University Press 1992)
- Kim, 1998, 197, 117
- Pitt, 1992, 69, 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Bates, D. G., Postlethwaite, I., Ma, L., & Iglesias, P. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 96
- ISSN
- 1741-2471 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092313542
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systems Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
- Keywords
- model robustness, biochemical network models, parameter sensitivity, cAMP oscillations, Dictyostelium discoideum, chemotaxis, positive feedback loop, robust control, nonlinear differential equations, oscillatory dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Cyclic AMP, Animals, Biochemistry, Biological Clocks, Cells, Cultured, Chemotaxis, Computer Simulation, Dictyostelium, Feedback, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Transduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/ip-syb:20050024
- The paper
- Kim, J., Bates, D. G., Postlethwaite, I., Ma, L., & Iglesias, P. A. (2006). Robustness analysis of biochemical network models. IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-syb%3A20050024