Cited by 32Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAnimal testing and alternativesPharmaceutical studies and practices

Application of predictive biosimulation within pharmaceutical clinical development: examples of significance for translational medicine and clinical trial design

Kansal, A.R., Trimmer, J.·2005·IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology

Abstract

The challenge of accurately predicting human clinical outcome based on preclinical data has led to a high failure rate of compounds in human clinical trials. A series of methods are described by which biosimulation can address these challenges and guide the design and evaluation of experimental and clinical protocols. Early compound development often proceeds on the basis of preclinical data from animal models. The systematic evaluation possible in a simulation can assist in the critical step of translating the preclinical outcomes to human physiology. Later in the process, clinical trials definitively establish a therapy's beneficial effects, as well as any adverse side effects. Biosimulation allows for the optimal design of clinical trials to ensure that key issues are addressed effectively and efficiently, and in doing so, improves the success rate of the trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/ip-syb:20050043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 32

Authors
Kansal, A. R., & Trimmer, J.
Venue
IEE Proceedings - Systems Biology
Published
2005
Volume
152
Issue
4
Pages
214
ISSN
1741-2471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025654004
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Systems Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
translational medicine, clinical trial design, animal models, clinical trial success rates, adverse drug reactions, human physiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Clinical Trials as Topic, Computer Simulation, Diabetes Mellitus, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Industry, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Glycogen, Humans, Insulin, Liver, Male, Models, Biological, Research Design, Species Specificity, Drug Design, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review