The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of compression and packet loss effects in speech biometrics
Abstract
An overview is presented of compression and packet loss effects in speech biometrics. These new problems appear particularly in recent applications of biometrics over mobile or Internet networks. The influence of speech compression on speaker recognition performance in mobile networks is investigated. In a first experiment, it is found that the use of GSM coding degrades the performance. In a second experiment, the features for the speaker recognition system are calculated directly from the information available in the encoded bit stream. It is found that a low LPC order in GSM coding is responsible for most performance degradations. A speaker recognition system was obtained which is equivalent in performance to the original one which decodes and reanalyses speech before performing recognition. The joint packet loss and compression effects over IP networks are also studied. It is experimentally demonstrated that the adverse effects of packet loss alone are negligible, while the encoding of speech, particularly at a low bit rate, coupled with packet loss, can reduce the verification accuracy considerably.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, over mobile or internet networks, the combined effects of audio codec compression and channel transmission degradation reduce the speech quality [28].”
From Benchmarking Audio Deepfake Detection Robustness in Real-World Communication Scenarios (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Prior studies indicate that channel-induced data loss degrades the performance of audio-based feature systems [28]”
From Benchmarking Audio Deepfake Detection Robustness in Real-World Communication Scenarios (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate Gaussian mixture observations of Markov chains
Gauvain, J.-L., & Lee, C. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · doi:10.1109/89.279278 · Cited by 2,141
Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
Reynolds, D. A. (1995) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(95)00009-d · Cited by 1,216
Score Normalization for Text-Independent Speaker Verification Systems
Auckenthaler, R., Carey, M. J., & Lloyd-Thomas, H. (2000) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1006/dspr.1999.0360 · Cited by 698
Adaptive FEC-based error control for Internet telephony
Bolot, J.-C., Fosse-Parisis, S., & Towsley, D. (1999) · doi:10.1109/infcom.1999.752166 · Cited by 354
Second-order statistical measures for text-independent speaker identification
Bimbot, F., Magrin‐Chagnolleau, I., & Mathan, L. (1995) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(95)00013-e · Cited by 128
Normalizations and selection of speech segments for speaker recognition scoring
Li, K.-P., & Porter, J. E. (2003) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1988.196655 · Cited by 109
Recognizing voice over IP: a robust front-end for speech recognition on the world wide web
Peláez-Moreno, C., Gallardo-Antolín, A., & Díaz-de-María, F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/6046.923820 · Cited by 64
Black, U. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 55
Speech recognition from GSM codec parameters
Huerta, J. M., & Stern, R. M. (1998) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.1998-329 · Cited by 48
Speaker and Language Recognition Using Speech Codec Parameters
Quatieri, T. F., Singer, E., Dunn, R. B., et al. (1999) · doi:10.21236/ada526525 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- El-Maliki, 1999, Proc. COST 254 Workshop
- Evans, N.W.D., Mason, J.S., Auckenthaler, R., and Stapert, R.: ‘Assessment of speaker verification degradation due to packet loss in the context of wireless mobile devices’, Presented at COST 275 Workshop on Biometrics over the Internet, Rome, Italy 2002 November)
- Broun, 2001, Presented at 2001: A Speaker Odyssey, The Speaker Recognition Workshop
- Reynolds, 1994, Proc. Workshop on Automatic speaker recognition, identification and verification, 27
- Huerta, 1998, Proc. Int. Conf. on Spoken language processing (ICSLP)
- Bolot, 1999, Proc. IEEE Infocom'99
- Yajnik, 1999, Proc. IEEE Infocom'99
- Magrin-Chagnolleau, 2001, Proc 2001: A Speaker Odyssey, 67
- Mayorga-Ortiz, 2002, Proc. Eusipco 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A study on data augmentation in voice anti-spoofing
Cohen, A., Rimon, I., Aflalo, E., & Permuter, H. H. (2022) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2022.04.005 · Cited by 60
Benchmarking Audio Deepfake Detection Robustness in Real-World Communication Scenarios
Shi, H., Shi, X., Dogan, S., Alzubi, S., Huang, T., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · 2025 33rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco63237.2025.11226601 · Cited by 8
“Prior studies indicate that channel-induced data loss degrades the performance of audio-based feature systems [28], while codec-induced compression artifacts result in diminished audio quality as high-frequency information is lost [29], which reduces the robustness of the ADD system.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Besacier, L., Mayorga, P., Bonastre, J.-F., Fredouille, C., & Meignier, S.
- Affiliations
- Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
- Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR)
- Venue
- IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image, and Signal Processing
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 372
- ISSN
- 1350-245X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059187471
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- voice biometrics, speech coding, packet loss, speaker recognition, cellular networks, IP networks, low bit rate speech, speaker verification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of compression and packet loss effects in speech biometrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1049/ip-vis:20031033
- The paper
- Besacier, L., Mayorga, P., Bonastre, J.-F., Fredouille, C., & Meignier, S. (2003). Overview of compression and packet loss effects in speech biometrics. IEE Proceedings - Vision, Image, and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-vis%3A20031033
