Cited by 348Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceHistory and Developments in Astronomy

Is tidal heating sufficient to explain bloated exoplanets? Consistent calculations accounting for finite initial eccentricity

Open access
Leconte, J., Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Levrard, B.·2010·Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

We present the consistent evolution of short-period exoplanets coupling the tidal and gravothermal evolution of the planet. Contrarily to previous similar studies, our calculations are based on the complete tidal evolution equations of the Hut (1981) model, valid at any order in eccentricity, obliquity and spin. We demonstrate both analytically and numerically that except if the system was formed with a nearly circular orbit (e 0.2), consistently solving the complete tidal equations is mandatory to derive correct tidal evolution histories. We show that calculations based on tidal models truncated at 2nd order in eccentricity, as done in all previous studies, lead to quantitatively and sometimes even qualitatively erroneous tidal evolutions. As a consequence, tidal energy dissipation rates are severely underestimated in all these calculations and the characteristic timescales for the various orbital parameters evolutions can be wrong by up to three orders of magnitude. These discrepancies can by no means be justified by invoking the uncertainty in the tidal quality factors. Based on these complete, consistent calculations, we revisit the viability of the tidal heating hypothesis to explain the anomalously large radius of transiting giant planets. We show that even though tidal dissipation does provide a substantial contribution to the planet's heat budget and can explain some of the moderately bloated hot-Jupiters, this mechanism can not explain alone the properties of the most inflated objects, including HD 209 458 b. Indeed, solving the complete tidal equations shows that enhanced tidal dissipation and thus orbit circularization occur too early during the planet's evolution to provide enough extra energy at the present epoch. In that case either a third, so far undetected, low-mass companion must be present to keep exciting the eccentricity of the giant planet, or other mechanisms – stellar irradiation induced surface winds dissipating in the planet's tidal bulges and thus reaching the convective layers, inefficient flux transport by convection in the planet's interior – must be invoked, together with tidal dissipation, to provide all the pieces of the abnormally large exoplanet puzzle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201014337

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tidal heating shuts off as the orbit nears circularization, so stellar irradiation mechanisms could take over at that point.

    “Tidal heating shuts off as the orbit nears circularization (e.g., Leconte et al. 2010, Hansen 2010), so stellar irradiation mechanisms could take over at that point.”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Leconte et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Darwin, G. H. 1908, Scientific Papers (New York: Cambridge University Press)
  2. Ibgui, L., Spiegel, D. S., & Burrows, A. 2009, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:0910.5928] · arXiv
  3. McCullough, P. R., Burke, C. J., Valenti, J. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:0805.2921] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leconte, J., Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., & Levrard, B.
Affiliations
Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2010-06
Volume
516
Pages
A64
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2121777451
Cited by
348
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 18
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
tidal heating, hot Jupiters, tidal evolution, orbital eccentricity, tidal dissipation, tidal quality factor, HD 209458b, stellar irradiation, tidal bulge, convection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review