The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue
Open accessAbstract
Aims. Active galactic nuclei are known to have complex X-ray spectra that depend on both the properties of the accreting super-massive black hole (e.g. mass, accretion rate) and the distribution of obscuring material in its vicinity (i.e. the “torus”). Often however, simple and even unphysical models are adopted to represent the X-ray spectra of AGN, which do not capture the complexity and diversity of the observations. In the case of blank field surveys in particular, this should have an impact on e.g. the determination of the AGN luminosity function, the inferred accretion history of the Universe and also on our understanding of the relation between AGN and their host galaxies. Methods. We develop a Bayesian framework for model comparison and parameter estimation of X-ray spectra. We take into account uncertainties associated with both the Poisson nature of X-ray data and the determination of source redshift using photometric methods. We also demonstrate how Bayesian model comparison can be used to select among ten di erent physically motivated X-ray spectral models the one that provides a better representation of the observations. This methodology is applied to X-ray AGN in the 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field South. Results. For the 350 AGN in that field, our analysis identifies four components needed to represent the diversity of the observed X-ray spectra: (1) an intrinsic power law; (2) a cold obscurer which reprocesses the radiation due to photo-electric absorption, Compton scattering and Fe-K fluorescence; (3) an unabsorbed power law associated with Thomson scattering o ionised clouds; and (4) Compton reflection, most noticeable from a stronger-than-expected Fe-K line. Simpler models, such as a photo-electrically absorbed power law with a Thomson scattering component, are ruled out with decisive evidence (B > 100). We also find that ignoring the Thomson scattering component results in underestimation of the inferred column density, NH, of the obscurer. Regarding the geometry of the obscurer, there is strong evidence against both a completely closed (e.g. sphere), or entirely open (e.g. blob of material along the line of sight), toroidal geometry in favour of an intermediate case. Conclusions. Despite the use of low-count spectra, our methodology is able to draw strong inferences on the geometry of the torus. Simpler models are ruled out in favour of a geometrically extended structure with significant Compton scattering. We confirm the presence of a soft component, possibly associated with Thomson scattering o ionised clouds in the opening angle of the torus. The additional Compton reflection required by data over that predicted by toroidal geometry models, may be a sign of a density gradient in the torus or reflection o the accretion disk. Finally, we release a catalogue of AGN in the CDFS with estimated parameters such as the accretion luminosity in the 2 10 keV band and the column density, NH, of the obscurer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares
Levenberg, K. (1944) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/10666 · Cited by 12,359
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies
Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 · Cited by 4,196
Unified Models for Active Galactic Nuclei and Quasars
Antonucci, R. (1993) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 · Cited by 3,943
The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses
Wilks, S. S. (1938) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732360 · Cited by 3,493
Cited by
juliet: a versatile modelling tool for transiting and non-transiting exoplanetary systems
Espinoza, N., Kossakowski, D., & Brahm, R. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2688 · Cited by 348
A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715
Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., Vinciguerra, S., Riley, T. E., Kini, Y., Watts, A. L., Dorsman, B., Bogdanov, S., Guillot, S., Ray, P. S., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f · Cited by 291
PHOTOMETRIC SUPERNOVA CLASSIFICATION WITH MACHINE LEARNING
Lochner, M., McEwen, J. D., Peiris, H. V., Lahav, O., & Winter, M. K. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/31 · Cited by 200
Krissansen-Totton, J., Garland, R., Irwin, P., & Catling, D. C. (2018) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad564 · Cited by 145
Zhu, K., Lu, S., Cappellari, M., Li, R., Mao, S., & Gao, L. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1299 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Hsu, L., Rangel, C., Brightman, M., Merloni, A., Salvato, M., Donley, J., & Kocevski, D.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 564
- Pages
- A125
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2060819359
- Cited by
- 1,644
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201322971
- The paper
- Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Hsu, L., Rangel, C., Brightman, M., Merloni, A., Salvato, M., Donley, J., & Kocevski, D. (2014). X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.