The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Effective temperatures and surface gravities
Open accessAbstract
Context. In the era of large Galactic stellar surveys, carefully calibrating and validating the data sets has become an important and integral part of the data analysis. Moreover, new generations of stellar atmosphere models and spectral line formation computations need to be subjected to benchmark tests to assess any progress in predicting stellar properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data
(2007) · Astrophysics and Space Science Library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6342-8 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2: Binarity from proper motion anomaly
Kervella, P., Arenou, F., Mignard, F., & Thévenin, F. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 · Cited by 399
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heiter, U., Jofré, P., Gustafsson, B., Korn, A. J., Soubiran, C., & Thévenin, F.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 582
- Pages
- A49
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W1942800319
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Effective temperatures and surface gravities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201526319
- The paper
- Heiter, U., Jofré, P., Gustafsson, B., Korn, A. J., Soubiran, C., & Thévenin, F. (2015). Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Effective temperatures and surface gravities. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
