Cited by 38Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Pan-Planets: Searching for hot Jupiters around cool dwarfs

Open access
Obermeier, C., Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R. P., Henning, Th., Bender, R., Kodric, M., Deacon, N., Riffeser, A. +13 more·2016·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

The Pan-Planets survey observed an area of 42 sq deg. in the galactic disk for about 165 h. The main scientific goal of the project is the detection of transiting planets around M dwarfs. We establish an efficient procedure for determining the stellar parameters Teff and log g of all sources using a method based on SED fitting, utilizing a three-dimensional dust map and proper motion information. In this way we identify more than 60 000 M dwarfs, which is by far the largest sample of low-mass stars observed in a transit survey to date. We present several planet candidates around M dwarfs and hotter stars that are currently being followed up. Using Monte Carlo simulations we calculate the detection efficiency of the Pan-Planets survey for different stellar and planetary populations. We expect to find 3.0+3.3-1.6 hot Jupiters around F, G, and K dwarfs with periods lower than 10 days based on the planet occurrence rates derived in previous surveys. For M dwarfs, the percentage of stars with a hot Jupiter is under debate. Theoretical models expect a lower occurrence rate than for larger main sequence stars. However, radial velocity surveys find upper limits of about 1% due to their small sample, while the Kepler survey finds a occurrence rate that we estimate to be at least 0.17b(+0.67-0.04) %, making it even higher than the determined fraction from OGLE-III for F, G and K stellar types, 0.14 (+0.15-0.076) %. With the large sample size of Pan-Planets, we are able to determine an occurrence rate of 0.11 (+0.37-0.02) % in case one of our candidates turns out to be a real detection. If, however, none of our candidates turn out to be true planets, we are able to put an upper limit of 0.34% with a 95% confidence on the hot Jupiter occurrence rate of M dwarfs. This limit is a significant improvement over previous estimates where the lowest limit published so far is 1.1% found in the WFCAM Transit Survey. Therefore we cannot yet confirm the theoretical prediction of a lower occurrence rate for cool stars.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201527633

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obermeier et al. (2016) found the occurrence rate of hot Jupiters orbiting M-stars vs. FGK stars could be the same, but for the former, they only have an upper limit.

    “Obermeier et al. (2016) found the occurrence rate of hot Jupiters orbiting M-stars vs. FGK stars c ould be the same, but for the former, they only have an upper limit.”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Obermeier et al. (2016)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Alard, C., & Lupton, R. H. 1998, ApJ, 503, 325 · DOI
  2. Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Roy. Soc. London Phil. Trans. Ser. A, 370, 2765 · DOI
  3. Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A&A, 577, A42 · DOI
  4. Begeman, K., Belikov, A. N., Boxhoorn, D. R., & Valentijn, E. A. 2013, Exp. Astron., 35, 1 · DOI
  5. Bonfils, X., Delfosse, X., Udry, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A109 · DOI
  6. Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127 · DOI
  7. Chen, Y., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2525 · DOI
  8. Christiansen, J. L., Clarke, B. D., Burke, C. J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 95 · DOI
  9. Claret, A., & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75 · DOI
  10. Dawson, R. I., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2013, ApJ, 767, L24 · DOI
  11. Deacon, N. R., Kraus, A. L., Mann, A. W., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4212 · DOI
  12. Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremović, D., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89 · DOI
  13. Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2013, ApJ, 767, 95 · DOI
  14. Dressing, C. D., & Charbonneau, D. 2015, ApJ, 807, 45 · DOI
  15. Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. 1972, Commun. ACM, 15, 11 · DOI
  16. Fischer, D. A., & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102 · DOI
  17. Gaidos, E., & Mann, A. W. 2014, ApJ, 791, 54 · DOI
  18. Gonzalez, G. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 403 · DOI
  19. Gössl, C. A., & Riffeser, A. 2002, A&A, 381, 1095 · DOI
  20. Gould, A., Dorsher, S., Gaudi, B. S., & Udalski, A. 2006, Acta Astron., 56, 1 · DOI
  21. Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 25 · DOI
  22. Hartman, J. D., Gaudi, B. S., Holman, M. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 336 · DOI
  23. Hartman, J. D., Bayliss, D., Brahm, R., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 166 · DOI
  24. Henry, T. J., Jao, W.-C., Subasavage, J. P., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2360 · DOI
  25. Hill, G. J., MacQueen, P. J., Nicklas, H., et al. 1998, BAAS, 30, 1262 · DOI
  26. Hodapp, K. W., Kaiser, N., Aussel, H., et al. 2004, Astron. Nachr., 325, 636 · DOI
  27. Hopp, U., Bender, R., Grupp, F., et al. 2014, in SPIE Conf. Ser., 9145, 2 · DOI
  28. Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2005, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 158, 68 · DOI
  29. Johnson, J. A., & Apps, K. 2009, ApJ, 699, 933 · DOI
  30. Johnson, J. A., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 833 · DOI
  31. Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. 2010, PASP, 122, 905 · DOI
  32. Johnson, J. A., Gazak, J. Z., Apps, K., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 111 · DOI
  33. Kaiser, N., Aussel, H., Burke, B. E., et al. 2002, in Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries, eds. J. A. Tyson, & S. Wolff, SPIE Conf. Ser., 4836, 154 · DOI
  34. Koppenhoefer, J., Afonso, C., Saglia, R. P., & Henning, T. 2009, A&A, 494, 707 · DOI
  35. Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R. P., & Riffeser, A. 2013, Exp. Astron., 35, 329 · DOI
  36. Kosyra, R., Gössl, C., Hopp, U., et al. 2014, Exp. Astron., 38, 213 · DOI
  37. Kovács, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. 2002, A&A, 391, 369 · DOI
  38. Kovács, G., Hodgkin, S., Sipőcz, B., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 889 · DOI
  39. Magnier, E. 2006, in The Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 50
  40. Mann, A. W., Gaidos, E., Lépine, S., & Hilton, E. J. 2012, ApJ, 753, 90 · DOI
  41. Mann, A. W., Gaidos, E., Kraus, A., & Hilton, E. J. 2013, ApJ, 770, 43 · DOI
  42. Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Canzian, B., et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 984 · DOI
  43. Montet, B. T., Crepp, J. R., Johnson, J. A., Howard, A. W., & Marcy, G. W. 2014, ApJ, 781, 28 · DOI
  44. Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., Klahr, H., & Henning, T. 2012, A&A, 541, A97 · DOI
  45. Morton, T. D., & Swift, J. 2014, ApJ, 791, 10 · DOI
  46. Neves, V., Bonfils, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A36 · DOI
  47. Norton, A. J., Payne, S. G., Evans, T., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A90 · DOI
  48. Patat, F., & Taubenberger, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A57 · DOI
  49. Petigura, E. A., Howard, A. W., & Marcy, G. W. 2013a, PNAS, 110, 19273 · DOI
  50. Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., & Howard, A. W. 2013b, ApJ, 770, 69 · DOI
  51. Ramsey, L. W., Adams, M. T., Barnes, T. G., et al. 1998, in Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, ed. L. M. Stepp, SPIE Conf. Ser., 3352, 34
  52. Ries, J., & Riddle, A. 2014, in Proc. Conf. Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 2014, eds. K. Muinonen, A. Penttilä, M. Granvik, et al., 446
  53. Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S. 2003, A&A, 409, 523 · DOI
  54. Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2001, A&A, 373, 1019 · DOI
  55. Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103 · DOI
  56. Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 · DOI
  57. Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163 · DOI
  58. Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1466 · DOI
  59. Tomaney, A. B., & Crotts, A. P. S. 1996, AJ, 112, 2872 · DOI
  60. Tonry, J., & Onaka, P. 2009, in Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 40
  61. Tonry, J., & Pan-STARRS Team 2005, BAAS, 37, 1363 · DOI
  62. Torres-Dodgen, A. V., & Weaver, W. B. 1993, PASP, 105, 693 · DOI
  63. Triaud, A. H. M. J., Anderson, D. R., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A80 · DOI
  64. West, A. A., Morgan, D. P., Bochanski, J. J., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 97 · DOI
  65. Winters, J. G., Henry, T. J., Lurie, J. C., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 5 · DOI
  66. Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868 · DOI
  67. Zendejas Dominguez, J., Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R. P., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A92 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obermeier, C., Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R. P., Henning, T., Bender, R., Kodric, M., Deacon, N., Riffeser, A., Burgett, W., Chambers, K. C., Draper, P. W., Flewelling, H., Hodapp, K. W., Kaiser, N., Kudritzki, R.-P., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., Price, P. A., Sweeney, W., Wainscoat, R. J., & Waters, C.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
587
Pages
A49
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2239125316
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1238877)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX08AR22G, AST-1238877)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NNX08AR22G)
  • Strong
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Durham University
  • Queen's University
  • Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
  • National Central University
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  • Science Mission Directorate (NNX08AR22G)
  • Planetary Science Division (NNX08AR22G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
hot Jupiters, M dwarfs, transiting exoplanets, planet occurrence rate, stellar parameters, spectral energy distribution fitting, proper motions, planet candidates, low-mass stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review