Evolution and magnitudes of candidate planet nine
Open accessAbstract
Context. The recently renewed interest in a possible additional major body in the outer solar system prompted us to study the thermodynamic evolution of such an object. We assumed that it is a smaller version of Uranus and Neptune.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stronger limits can be derived for smaller distances, but such results are model-specific because infrared emission is dominated by internal energy sources, rendering the observational signature dependent on the detailed interior structure of the planet.
“Note that stronger limits can be derived for smaller distances, but such results are model-specific (Meisner et al., 2017a,b). This is because infrared emission is dominated by the internal energy sources of the planet, rendering its observational signature (surface emission in the WISE bands) dependent on the detailed interior structure of the planet (Ginzburg et al., 2016; Linder and Mordasini,”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Linder and Mordasini, 2016
Interior modeling efforts compute physical radii of 1.9-3.7 R for an isolated 10 M object.
“Such estimates are further consistent with the interior modeling e orts of Linder and Mordasini (2016) who compute physical radii of 1 : 9 3 : 7 R for an isolated 10 M object (see also Ginzburg et al. 2016).”
From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Linder and Mordasini (2016)
Cites
Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System
Batygin, K., & Brown, M. E. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22 · Cited by 432 · cited 7× · see citing works
“2), however, and additionally, it is assumed to have an inclination of i = 30◦ (Batygin & Brown 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units
Trujillo, C. A., & Sheppard, S. S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13156 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid
Brown, M. E., Trujillo, C., & Rabinowitz, D. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422095 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
PROPERTIES OF THE DISTANT KUIPER BELT: RESULTS FROM THE PALOMAR DISTANT SOLAR SYSTEM SURVEY
Schwamb, M. E., Brown, M. E., Rabinowitz, D. L., & Ragozzine, D. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1691 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., Brown, M. E., & Becker, J. C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“This is because infrared emission is dominated by the internal energy sources of the planet, rendering its observational signature (surface emission in the WISE bands) dependent on the detailed interior structure of the planet (Ginzburg et al., 2016; Linder and Mordasini, 2016).”
BackgroundNew Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects: Toward a Super-Earth in the Outer Solar System
Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/152/6/221 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Consequences of a Distant Massive Planet on the Large Semimajor Axis Trans-Neptunian Objects
Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Lawler, S. M., Gladman, B. J., & Bannister, M. T. (2017) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/63 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
THE HUNT FOR PLANET NINE: ATMOSPHERE, SPECTRA, EVOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Laughlin, G., Nettelmann, N., Morley, C. V., Lupu, R. E., Visscher, C., Jeremic, P., Khadder, W. G., & Hargrave, M. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/l25 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Linder, E. F., & Mordasini, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2016-04-25
- Volume
- 589
- Pages
- A134
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2280544169
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (155816)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Keywords
- Planet Nine, trans-Neptunian objects, outer solar system, thermodynamic evolution, Uranus, Neptune, hypothetical planet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
