The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaia Data Release 2: Using Gaia parallaxes
Open accessAbstract
Context.The second Gaia data release (Gaia DR2) provides precise five-parameter astrometric data (positions, proper motions, and parallaxes) for an unprecedented number of sources (more than 1.3 billion, mostly stars). This new wealth of data will enable the undertaking of statistical analysis of many astrophysical problems that were previously infeasible for lack of reliable astrometry, and in particular because of the lack of parallaxes. However, the use of this wealth of astrometric data comes with a specific challenge: how can the astrophysical parameters of interest be properly inferred from these data? Aims.The main focus of this paper, but not the only focus, is the issue of the estimation of distances from parallaxes, possibly combined with other information. We start with a critical review of the methods traditionally used to obtain distances from parallaxes and their shortcomings. Then we provide guidelines on how to use parallaxes more efficiently to estimate distances by using Bayesian methods. In particular we also show that negative parallaxes, or parallaxes with relatively large uncertainties still contain valuable information. Finally, we provide examples that show more generally how to use astrometric data for parameter estimation, including the combination of proper motions and parallaxes and the handling of covariances in the uncertainties. Methods.The paper contains examples based on simulated Gaia data to illustrate the problems and the solutions proposed. Furthermore, the developments and methods proposed in the paper are linked to a set of tutorials included in the Gaia archive documentation that provide practical examples and a good starting point for the application of the recommendations to actual problems. In all cases the source code for the analysis methods is provided. Results.Our main recommendation is to always treat the derivation of (astro-)physical parameters from astrometric data, in particular when parallaxes are involved, as an inference problem which should preferably be handled with a full Bayesian approach. Conclusions.Gaia will provide fundamental data for many fields of astronomy. Further data releases will provide more data, and more precise data. Nevertheless, to fully use the potential it will always be necessary to pay careful attention to the statistical treatment of parallaxes and proper motions. The purpose of this paper is to help astronomers find the correct approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaia Data Release 2: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F., Luri, X., Babusiaux, C., Fabricius, C., Helmi, A., Muraveva, T., Robin, A. C., Spoto, F., Vallenari, A., Antoja, T., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833234 · Cited by 601
Self-citation
Cited by
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the contents and survey properties
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., Eyer, L., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 · Cited by 8,442
Self-citationGaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration, Babusiaux, C., van Leeuwen, F., Barstow, M. A., Jordi, C., Vallenari, A., Bossini, D., Bressan, A., Cantat-Gaudin, T., van Leeuwen, M., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832843 · Cited by 870
Self-citationA dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk
Antoja, T., Helmi, A., Romero-Gómez, M., Katz, D., Babusiaux, C., Drimmel, R., Evans, D. W., Figueras, F., Poggio, E., Reylé, C., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7 · Cited by 498
Self-citationCygnus X-1 contains a 21–solar mass black hole—Implications for massive star winds
Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., Orosz, J. A., Mandel, I., Gou, L., Maccarone, T. J., Neijssel, C. J., Zhao, X., Ziółkowski, J., Reid, M. J., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb3363 · Cited by 284
Uncovering the birth of the Milky Way through accurate stellar ages with Gaia
Gallart, C., Bernard, E. J., Brook, C. B., Ruiz-Lara, T., Cassisi, S., Hill, V., & Monelli, M. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0829-5 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., Arenou, F., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Castro-Ginard, A., de Bruijne, J., Prusti, T., Babusiaux, C., & Delgado, H. E.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 616
- Pages
- A9
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W4289710459
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaia Data Release 2: Using Gaia parallaxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201832964
- The paper
- Luri, X., Brown, A. G. A., Sarro, L. M., Arenou, F., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Castro-Ginard, A., de Bruijne, J., Prusti, T., Babusiaux, C., & Delgado, H. E. (2018). Gaia Data Release 2: Using Gaia parallaxes. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.