Stellar population of Sco OB2 revealed by Gaia DR2 data
Open accessAbstract
Context. The Sco OB2 association is the nearest OB association, extending over approximately 2000 square degrees on the sky. Only its brightest and most massive members are already known (from H IPPARCOS) across its entire size, while studies of its lower mass population refer only to small portions of its extent. Aims. In this work we exploit the capabilities of Gaia DR2 measurements to search for Sco OB2 members across its entire size and down to the lowest stellar masses. Methods. We used both Gaia astrometric (proper motions and parallaxes) and photometric measurements (integrated photometry and colors) to select association members, using minimal assumptions derived mostly from the H IPPARCOS studies. Gaia resolves small details in both the kinematics of individual Sco OB2 subgroups and their distribution with distance from the Sun. We developed methods to explore the 3D kinematics of a stellar population covering large sky areas. Results. We find nearly 11 000 pre-main-sequence (PMS) members of Sco OB2 (with less than 3% field-star contamination), plus ∼3600 main-sequence (MS) candidate members with a larger (10–30%) field-star contamination. A higher confidence subsample of ∼9200 PMS (and ∼1340 MS) members is also selected (<1% contamination for the PMS), however this group is affected by larger (∼15%) incompleteness. We separately classify stars in compact and diffuse populations. Most members belong to one of several kinematically distinct diffuse populations, whose ensemble clearly outlines the shape of the entire association. Upper Sco is the densest region of Sco OB2. It is characterized by a complex spatial and kinematical structure and has no global pattern of motion. Other dense subclusters are found in Lower Centaurus-Crux and in Upper Centaurus-Lupus; the richest example of the latter, which has been recently identified, is coincident with the group near V1062 Sco. Most of the clustered stars appear to be younger than the diffuse PMS population, suggesting star formation in small groups that rapidly disperse and are diluted, reaching space densities lower than field stars while keeping memory of their original kinematics. We also find that the open cluster IC 2602 has a similar dynamics to Sco OB2, and its PMS members are currently evaporating and forming a diffuse (size ∼10°) halo around its double-peaked core.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The required mass for the power is consistent with the mass estimated for the Sco-Cen association.
“The required mass is, in fact, quite consistent with the mass estimated for the Sco-Cen association (Damiani et al. 2019; Žerjal et al. 2023).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Damiani et al. 2019
Cites
A [ITAL]Hipparcos[/ITAL] Census of the Nearby OB Associations
de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. (1999) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300682 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
<i>Gaia</i> Data Release 2: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F., Luri, X., Babusiaux, C., Fabricius, C., Helmi, A., Muraveva, T., Robin, A. C., Spoto, F., Vallenari, A., Antoja, T., et al. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833234 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Pecaut, M. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Bubar, E. J. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/154 · Cited by 564 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Studies such as Pecaut et al. (2012) or Pecaut & Mamajek (2016; PM16) on the late-type Sco OB2 population discovered less than 600 members, selected using a wide variety of methods; others like Hoogerwerf (2000) are affected by substantial field-star contamination.”
BackgroundResultPost–T Tauri Stars in the Nearest OB Association
Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R., & Liebert, J. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/341952 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“The required mass is, in fact, quite consistent with the mass estimated for the Sco-Cen association (Damiani et al. 2019; Žerjal et al. 2023).”
Method
- Authors
- Damiani, F., Prisinzano, L., Pillitteri, I., Micela, G., & Sciortino, S.
- Affiliations
- Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo (IT)
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 623
- Pages
- A112
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2887815186
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Space Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- OB associations, stellar populations, pre-main-sequence stars, main-sequence stars, three-dimensional kinematics, Upper Centaurus Lupus, Lower Centaurus Crux, IC 2602, field star contamination, Gaia DR2 astrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review