Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: A critical comparison of three data sets

Open access
Choudhury, T. R., Padmanabhan, T.·2005·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We extend our previous analysis of cosmological supernova type Ia data [CITE] to include three recent compilation of data sets. Our analysis ignores the possible correlations and systematic effects present in the data and concentrates mostly on some key theoretical issues. Among the three data sets, the first set consists of 194 points obtained from various observations while the second discards some of the points from the first one because of large uncertainties and thus consists of 142 points. The third data set is obtained from the second by adding the latest 14 points observed through HST. A careful comparison of these different data sets help us to draw the following conclusions: (i) All the three data sets strongly rule out non-accelerating models. Interestingly, the first and the second data sets favour a closed universe; if , then the probability of obtaining models with is 0.97. Hence these data sets are in mild disagreement with the “concordance” flat model. However, this disagreement is reduced (the probability of obtaining models with being ≈0.9) for the third data set, which includes the most recent points observed by HST around . (ii) When the first data set is divided into two separate subsets consisting of low () and high () redshift supernova, it turns out that these two subsets, individually, admit non-accelerating models with zero dark energy because of different magnitude zero-point values for the different subsets. This can also be seen when the data is analysed while allowing for possibly different magnitude zero-points for the two redshift subsets. However, the non-accelerating models seem to be ruled out using only the low redshift data for the other two data sets, which have less uncertainties. (iii) We have also found that it is quite difficult to measure the evolution of the dark energy equation of state though its present value can be constrained quite well. The best-fit value seems to mildly favour a dark energy component with current equation of state , thus opening the possibility of existence of more exotic forms of matter. However, the data is still consistent with the the standard cosmological constant at 99 per cent confidence level for .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20041168

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Choudhury, T. R., & Padmanabhan, T.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2005-01
Volume
429
Issue
3
Pages
807-818
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2102025998
Cited by
277
References
6
FWCI
28.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: A critical comparison of three data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20041168
The paper
Choudhury, T. R., & Padmanabhan, T. (2005). Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: A critical comparison of three data sets. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20041168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.