Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the relevance of subcritical hydrodynamic turbulence to accretion disk transport

Open access
Lesur, G., Longaretti, P.-Y.·2005·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Hydrodynamic unstratified Keplerian flows are known to be linearly stable at all Reynolds numbers, but may nevertheless become turbulent through nonlinear mechanisms. However, in the last ten years, conflicting points of view have appeared on this issue. We have revisited the problem through numerical simulations in the shearing sheet limit. It turns out that the effect of the Coriolis force in stabilizing the flow depends on whether the flow is cyclonic (cooperating shear and rotation vorticities) or anticyclonic (competing shear and rotation vorticities); Keplerian flows are anticyclonic. We have obtained the following results: i/ The Coriolis force does not quench turbulence in subcritical flows; however, turbulence is more efficient, and much more easily found, in cyclonic flows than in anticyclonic ones. ii/ The Reynolds number/rotation/resolution relation has been quantified in this problem. In particular we find that the resolution demand, when moving away from the marginal stability boundary, is much more severe for anticyclonic flows than for cyclonic ones. Presently available computer resources do not allow numerical codes to reach the Keplerian regime. iii/ The efficiency of turbulent transport is directly correlated to the Reynolds number of transition to turbulence Rg, in such a way that the Shakura-Sunyaev parameter . This correlation is nearly independent of the flow cyclonicity. The correlation is expected on the basis of generic physical arguments. iv/ Even the most optimistic extrapolations of our numerical data show that subcritical turbulent transport would be too inefficient in Keplerian flows by several orders of magnitude for astrophysical purposes. Vertical boundary conditions may play a role in this issue although no significant effect was found in our preliminary tests. v/ Our results suggest that the data obtained for Keplerian-like flows in a Taylor-Couette settings are largely affected by secondary flows, such as Ekman circulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20053683

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Lesur, G., & Longaretti, P.-Y.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2005-11-21
Volume
444
Issue
1
Pages
25-44
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2008673361
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relevance of subcritical hydrodynamic turbulence to accretion disk transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361:20053683
The paper
Lesur, G., & Longaretti, P.-Y. (2005). On the relevance of subcritical hydrodynamic turbulence to accretion disk transport. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%3A20053683

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.