The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New theoretical yields of intermediate mass stars
Open accessAbstract
We present theoretical yields of H, 4He, 12C, 13C, 14N, and 16O for stars with initial masses between 0.8 and 8 and initial metallicities , 0.004, 0.008, 0.02, and 0.04. We use the evolutionary tracks of the Geneva group up to the early asymptotic giant branch (AGB) in combination with a synthetic thermal-pulsing AGB evolution model to follow in detail the chemical evolution and mass loss up to the end of the AGB including the first, second, and third dredge-up phases. Most of the relations used are metallicity dependent to make a realistic comparison with stars of different initial abundances. The effect of Hot Bottom Burning (HBB) is included in an approximate way. The free parameters in our calculations are the mass loss scaling parameter for stars on the AGB (using a Reimers law), the minimum core mass for dredge-up , and the third dredge-up efficiency λ. As derived from previous extensive modeling, = 4, = 0.58 , and including HBB are in best agreement with observations of AGB stars both in the Galactic disk and Magellanic Clouds. The influence of specific model assumptions and adopted parameter values on the resulting AGB yields is examined and compared with earlier theoretical work. We compare the abundances predicted during the final stages of the AGB with those observed in planetary nebulae in the Galactic disk and show that the model with the aforementioned parameters is in good agreement with the observations. The metallicity dependent yields of intermediate mass stars presented in this paper are well suited for use in galactic chemical evolution models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abundance Gradients and the Formation of the Milky Way
Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Romano, D. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321427 · Cited by 688
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. (2002) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020755 · Cited by 623
Carbon‐enhanced Metal‐poor Stars. I. Chemical Compositions of 26 Stars
Aoki, W., Beers, T. C., Christlieb, N., Norris, J. E., Ryan, S. G., & Tsangarides, S. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/509817 · Cited by 496
The evolution of isotope ratios in the Milky Way Galaxy
Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Umeda, H. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18621.x · Cited by 401
The Helium Abundances of ω Centauri
Norris, J. E. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423986 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Hoek, L. B., & Groenewegen, M. A. T.
- Venue
- Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-328
- ISSN
- 0365-0138 (ISSN-L)
- 1286-4846
- OpenAlex
- W2132248250
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New theoretical yields of intermediate mass stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/aas:1997162
- The paper
- van den Hoek, L. B., & Groenewegen, M. A. T. (1997). New theoretical yields of intermediate mass stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1051/aas%3A1997162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.