Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Comparison of MobilenetV2 and EfficiennetB3 Method to Classify Diseases on Corn Leaves

Riyadi, Slamet, Mulya, Rezka, Nabila Realisti, Aulia·2024·E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract

Corn is an important commodity in Indonesia and one of the world’s staple foods. According to FAO in 2017, disease problems often hamper corn production. The main problems that affect crop yields are diseases that damage corn leaves, including rust, spot, blight and downy mildew. Manual disease identification on corn leaves has limitations in consistency and scalability. A digital image processing system is needed to increase the speed and accuracy of recognition. Classification of types of corn leaf disease is needed so that farmers can distinguish types of corn leaf disease. Therefore, to identify four forms of maize leaf disease, this study tested a CNN model using the EfficientNetB3 and MobileNetV2 architectures. The data used to evaluate these two models is divided into training and testing subsets. Based on test results with 50 epochs, EfficientNetB3 obtained 93.20% accuracy with a loss of 0.0850, while MobileNetV2 obtained 92.48% accuracy with a loss of 0.19020. When the test data is evaluated, EfficientNetB3 performs better than MobileNetV2. MobileNetV2 has limitations in handling complex feature representation on very complex data. On the other hand, although it provides better results, EfficientNetB3 has the disadvantage of high computing and memory resource requirements, which can hamper efficiency in practical implementation. Based on these findings, EfficientNetB3 is recommended because it performs better in maize leaf disease classification, shows smaller losses and higher accuracy than MobileNetV2. By using this model, corn plant diseases can be identified efficiently and precisely, thereby improving disease control and producing more productive corn plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/e3sconf/202459502006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Kurniawan, 2023, Teknologi & Sains …, 2, 51
  2. Khoiruddin, 2022, Journal of Dinda: Data Science, Information Technology, and Data Analytics, 2, 37
  3. Ikorasaki F. and Akbar M. B., “Detecting Corn Plant Disease with Expert System Using Bayes Theorem Method,” 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2018, no. Citsm, pp. 9–12, 2019, DOI: 10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674303. · doi:10.1109/citsm.2018.8674303
  4. Hidayat, 2019, Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi, 12, 51, 10.21609/jiki.v12i1.695 · doi:10.21609/jiki.v12i1.695
  5. Utama, 2024, Emerging Information Science and Technology, 5, 46, 10.18196/eist.v5i1.22602 · doi:10.18196/eist.v5i1.22602
  6. Mehlig B., “Convolutional Networks,” Machine Learning with Neural Networks, pp. 141–156, 2021, DOI: 10.1017/9781108860604.008. · doi:10.1017/9781108860604.008
  7. Adnan, 2023, IEEE Access, 11, 85426, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3303131 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Farman, 2022, Computers, Materials and Continua, 71, 2073, 10.32604/cmc.2022.018961 · DOI
  9. Buiu C., Dănăilă V. R., and Răduţă C. N., “MobileNetV2 ensemble for cervical precancerous lesions classification,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 5, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/PR8050595. · DOI
  10. Ardiansyah, 2023, Journal of Computer Science and Business, 14, 66
  11. Akay, 2021, IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol, 2, 104, 10.1109/OJEMB.2021.3066097 · DOI
  12. Putri Ayuni, 2023, ZONAsi: Journal of Information Systems, 5, 239, 10.31849/zn.v5i2.13874 · doi:10.31849/zn.v5i2.13874
  13. Widianto, 2023, Techno.Com, 22, 599, 10.33633/tc.v22i3.8425 · doi:10.33633/tc.v22i3.8425
  14. Prakosa, 2023, Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi (JUKANTI), 6, 107
  15. Winanto, 2023, Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 7, 68, 10.30871/jaic.v7i1.5991 · doi:10.30871/jaic.v7i1.5991
  16. Aravind, 2021, Volatiles & Essent. Oils, 8, 9375
  17. Rosadi, 2021, Jurnal Explore IT!, 13, 36
  18. Mawarni, 2023, Implementation of the CNN Method in Corn Disease Classification, 7, 1256
  19. Cai, 2023, Front Plant Sci, 14, 1
  20. Gulzar Y., “Fruit Image Classification Model Based on MobileNetV2 with Deep Transfer Learning Technique,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, DOI: 10.3390/su15031906. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Syamsuri, 2019, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9, 2796, 10.35940/ijitee.B6647.129219 · doi:10.35940/ijitee.b6647.129219
  22. Elfatimi, 2022, IEEE Access, 10, 9471, 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142817 · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3142817
  23. Of, 2023, Tomato Leaf Disease Detection Using Cutting-Edge Deep Learning, 66, 4320
  24. Atila, 2021, Ecol Inform, 61, 101182, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101182 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Riyadi, S., Mulya, R., & Nabila Realisti, A.
Venue
E3S Web of Conferences
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2024
Volume
595
Pages
02006
ISSN
2267-1242
Cited by
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of MobilenetV2 and EfficiennetB3 Method to Classify Diseases on Corn Leaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/e3sconf/202459502006
The paper
Riyadi, S., Mulya, R., & Nabila Realisti, A. (2024). Comparison of MobilenetV2 and EfficiennetB3 Method to Classify Diseases on Corn Leaves. E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459502006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.