How heat stress impairs cognition: A review of cognitive performance in indoor passive hyperthermal environments
Open accessAbstract
Hyperthermal indoor environments are receiving increasing attention due to the growing frequency of extreme heat events and the urban heat island effect. Because heat can be trapped indoors, resulting heat stress may impair cognitive performance and adversely affect health, productivity, and safety. Ensuring that all occupants remain within safe physiological limits is therefore essential to prevent heat-related illness. Despite the growing body of research in this field, recent reviews reflecting evidence on the cognitive impacts of indoor heat stress remain limited. To address this gap, this review focuses on indoor passive hyperthermal environments (air temperature of 30 °C or higher) in which occupants perform low-intensity activities typical of office and residential settings. In total, 13 experimental studies published after 2000 were examined, and the results indicate that: 1) a speed-accuracy trade-off occurs under heat stress, likely driven by psychological effects; 2) heat intensity and exposure duration interact to influence cognitive performance; 3) performance outcomes vary with task complexity, with complex tasks are more susceptible than simple tasks under identical conditions; and 4) human factors, such as age, gender, expectation and motivation, mental health condition, may modulate these effects. Accordingly, the authors suggest future research to integrate sensitive measures of brain activity with cognitive task under heat stress, as well as developing personalized mitigation strategies, such as tailored exposure limits, targeted cooling interventions, structured heat acclimation protocols, and environment-occupant matching recommendations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Liu, W., Zhong, W., & Wargocki, P. (2017) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.020 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., & Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Julian
- ORCID
- Wang, Julian
- Venue
- E3S Web of Conferences
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 716
- Pages
- 05035
- ISSN
- 2267-1242 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7164048451
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- E3S Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2215421)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Keywords
- heat stress, cognitive performance, passive heat exposure, speed-accuracy trade-off, task complexity, urban heat island, heat-related illness, heat acclimation, cooling interventions, mental health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review