Cited by 0Thermoregulation and physiological responsesBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

How heat stress impairs cognition: A review of cognitive performance in indoor passive hyperthermal environments

Open access
Zhao, Yijin, Wang, Julian·2026·E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract

Hyperthermal indoor environments are receiving increasing attention due to the growing frequency of extreme heat events and the urban heat island effect. Because heat can be trapped indoors, resulting heat stress may impair cognitive performance and adversely affect health, productivity, and safety. Ensuring that all occupants remain within safe physiological limits is therefore essential to prevent heat-related illness. Despite the growing body of research in this field, recent reviews reflecting evidence on the cognitive impacts of indoor heat stress remain limited. To address this gap, this review focuses on indoor passive hyperthermal environments (air temperature of 30 °C or higher) in which occupants perform low-intensity activities typical of office and residential settings. In total, 13 experimental studies published after 2000 were examined, and the results indicate that: 1) a speed-accuracy trade-off occurs under heat stress, likely driven by psychological effects; 2) heat intensity and exposure duration interact to influence cognitive performance; 3) performance outcomes vary with task complexity, with complex tasks are more susceptible than simple tasks under identical conditions; and 4) human factors, such as age, gender, expectation and motivation, mental health condition, may modulate these effects. Accordingly, the authors suggest future research to integrate sensitive measures of brain activity with cognitive task under heat stress, as well as developing personalized mitigation strategies, such as tailored exposure limits, targeted cooling interventions, structured heat acclimation protocols, and environment-occupant matching recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/e3sconf/202671605035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Julian
Venue
E3S Web of Conferences
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2026
Volume
716
Pages
05035
ISSN
2267-1242 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7164048451
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • E3S Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2215421)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
heat stress, cognitive performance, passive heat exposure, speed-accuracy trade-off, task complexity, urban heat island, heat-related illness, heat acclimation, cooling interventions, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review