Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 740

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Remarks on polyelectrolyte conformation

Open access
De Gennes, P.G., Pincus, P., Velasco, R.M., Brochard, F.·1976·Journal de Physique

Abstract

We discuss the conformations of linear polyions assuming that a) the corresponding uncharged chain is flexible ; b) electrostatic forces dominate the monomer-monomer interactions; c) no salt is added. 1) For the dilute case (non overlapping chains) correcting a recent self-consistent calculation by Richmond [1a], we find an overall polyion size R = Nd which is a linear function of the polymerization index N in agreement with the early work of Hermans and Overbeek, [1b], Kuhn, Kunzle, and Katchalsky [1c]. 2) There is a range of very low concentration c (c** < c < c*) where the chains do not overlap (c < c*) but where the electrostatic interactions between polyions are much larger than thermal energies ( c > c**) : here we expect that the polyions build up a 3-dimensional periodic lattice ; however, the detection of such an extremely dilute lattice appears difficult. 3) Practically all experiments on salt-free polyelectrolytes have been performed at concentrations c > c* where different chains overlap each other. To discuss this regime we restrict our attention to cases where the charge per unit length is near (or above) the condensation threshold : then a single length ξ( c) characterizes the correlation; in 3 dimensions ξ scales like the Debye radius associated with the counter ions. We consider several possible conformations : a) hexagonal lattice of rigid rods ; b) cubic lattice of rigid rods ; c) isotropic phase of partially flexible chains. The various rigid rod structures appear to have very similar electrostatic energies. This suggests that the isotropic phase might possibly be the most favorable. We analyse this latter phase using the same scaling methods which have recently been helpful for neutral polymer solutions (2). In the isotropic model each chain behaves like a succession of segments of size. Inside one segment electrostatic effects are important and similar to case (1) above. Between segments the interactions are screened out, and tach chain is ideal on a large scale, with radius R (c) ∼ c-1/4 N1/2 . If we (tentatively) assume that the dynamical effects of entanglements are weak, we are than led to a viscosity ηsp/c ∼ Nc-1/2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/jphys:0197600370120146100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 740

Metadata

Authors
De Gennes, P. G., Pincus, P., Velasco, R. M., & Brochard, F.
Venue
Journal de Physique
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
1976
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
1461-1473
ISSN
0302-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024815569
Cited by
740
References
0
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remarks on polyelectrolyte conformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/jphys:0197600370120146100
The paper
De Gennes, P. G., Pincus, P., Velasco, R. M., & Brochard, F. (1976). Remarks on polyelectrolyte conformation. Journal de Physique. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys%3A0197600370120146100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.