The DOI matches its Crossref record.
La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement
Open accessAbstract
M. Schrödinger et la plupart des auteurs qui se sont occupés de Mécanique ondulatoire ont cherché à représenter les phénomènes dynamiques par des propagations d'ondes à amplitude continue du type classique en Optique. Au premier abord, il est difficile de comprendre comment ce point de vue peut se concilier avec la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement, structure qui n'est plus guère contestée aujourd'hui. Le but du présent mémoire est de montrer que les solutions continues fournissent, en réalité, seulement une certaine vue statistique des phénomènes dynamiques dont la description exacte exige sans doute la considération d'ondes comportant des singularités. En particulier, ce genre de conceptions permet de donner un sens clair à l'équation proposée par Schrodinger pour la dynamique des systèmes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another class of theories that violate (Q), although in a less obvious manner, are particular “hidden-variable (HV) interpretations”28, with “Bohmian mechanics” as the most prominent example29–31.”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bell's theorem. Experimental tests and implications
Clauser, J. F., & Shimony, A. (1978) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · Cited by 1,551
Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism
Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250402 · Cited by 1,402
The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
Cramer, J. G. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.647 · Cited by 875
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333
Kavokin, A. V., Baumberg, J. J., Malpuech, G., & Laussy, F. P. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198782995.001.0001 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- de Broglie, L.
- Corresponding author
- de Broglie, Louis
- Venue
- Journal de Physique et le Radium
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 1927
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 225-241
- ISSN
- 0302-0738 (ISSN-L)
- 0368-3842
- OpenAlex
- W2007878406
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal de physique (publishedVersion)
- Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Keywords
- wave mechanics, Schrödinger equation, atomic structure, radiation, statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
