Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example
Open accessAbstract
Managers have to make decisions several times a day. The decision-making process can be defined as an essential activity realized by managers every day. Decisions can be implemented intuitively, or by using relevant decision-making methods. This depends on the nature of the decision, as well as the intensity of its possible future effects. The theory of decision-making can be defined as a relatively young discipline. It can be stated that decision-making is no longer an intuitive process. Most decision-making situations are of a multiple criteria character. In this contribution, the authors focus on multiple-criteria decision-making, to which several methods can be applied. In the practical part, the authors use Saaty's method, also known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Saaty is considered to be the most important researcher dealing with the issue of multiple-criteria decision-making. The set multiple-criteria decision-making problem was to choose one business partner out of eight under consideration. The decision-making criteria included selected financial indicators and non-financial criteria. The aim of the contribution is to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess potential business partners and to select an optimal candidate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The consistency ratio (CR) of 0.0032 (0.32%) is less than 0.1, confirming the consistency of the hierarchy of criteria.
“The resulting CR < 0.1 confirms the consistency of the hierarchy of the criteria listed above [26].”
From Multicriteria Methodology for Prioritizing Predictive Maintenance Using RPASs (Drones) with Thermal Cameras on Transmission Lines (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schnorr, A., Bernardon, D., Feil, D., Fabrin, F., Konrad, C., dos Santos, L. L. C., Bitencourt, V., Fontoura, H., & Correa, C. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25165064 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siekelova, A., Podhorska, I., & Imppola, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI)
- Venue
- SHS Web of Conferences
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 01019
- ISSN
- 2261-2424 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120419971
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SHS Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
- Keywords
- analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision making, business partner selection, financial indicators, non-financial factors, management decision-making, supplier selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review