Cited by 47Multi-Criteria Decision MakingDecision Support System ApplicationsStrategic Planning and Analysis

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

Open access
Siekelova, Anna, Podhorska, Ivana, Imppola, Jorma J.·2021·SHS Web of Conferences

Abstract

Managers have to make decisions several times a day. The decision-making process can be defined as an essential activity realized by managers every day. Decisions can be implemented intuitively, or by using relevant decision-making methods. This depends on the nature of the decision, as well as the intensity of its possible future effects. The theory of decision-making can be defined as a relatively young discipline. It can be stated that decision-making is no longer an intuitive process. Most decision-making situations are of a multiple criteria character. In this contribution, the authors focus on multiple-criteria decision-making, to which several methods can be applied. In the practical part, the authors use Saaty's method, also known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Saaty is considered to be the most important researcher dealing with the issue of multiple-criteria decision-making. The set multiple-criteria decision-making problem was to choose one business partner out of eight under consideration. The decision-making criteria included selected financial indicators and non-financial criteria. The aim of the contribution is to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess potential business partners and to select an optimal candidate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/shsconf/20219001019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siekelova, A., Podhorska, I., & Imppola, J. J.
Affiliations
Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Venue
SHS Web of Conferences
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2021
Volume
90
Pages
01019
ISSN
2261-2424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120419971
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SHS Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
Keywords
analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision making, business partner selection, financial indicators, non-financial factors, management decision-making, supplier selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review