The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From the discovery of the Malta fever?s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis
Open accessAbstract
Brucellosis is not a sustainable disease in humans. The source of human infection always resides in domestic or wild animal reservoirs. The routes of infection are multiple: food-borne, occupational or recreational, linked to travel and even to bioterrorism. New Brucella strains or species may emerge and existing Brucella species adapt to changing social, cultural, travel and agricultural environment. Brucella melitensis is the most important zoonotic agent, followed by Brucella abortus and Brucella suis. This correlates with the fact that worldwide, the control of bovine brucellosis (due to B. abortus) has been achieved to a greater extent than the control of sheep and goat brucellosis (due to B. melitensis), these latter species being the most important domestic animals in many developing countries. The long duration and high cost of treatment of human brucellosis reduces the efficacy of the therapy. There is no human vaccine for brucellosis and the occurrence of brucellosis is directly linked to the status of animal brucellosis in a region. In this context, the Word Health Organization has defined the development of a human vaccine, besides the implementation of control and eradication programs in animals, as a high priority. The pathogenicity for humans of B. suis biovars 1, 3 and 4 is well established, whereas B. suis biovar 2 seems to be less pathogenic. Indeed, although hunters and pig farmers have repeatably experienced infectious contact with B. suis biovar 2 (found in wild boar and outdoor-rearing pigs in Europe), isolation of B. suis biovar 2 from human samples have only been seldom reported. Marine mammal brucellosis, due to two new proposed Brucella species i.e. B. cetaceae and B. pinnipediae, represents a new zoonotic threat but the pathogenicity for humans of the different Brucella species found in cetaceans and pinnipeds still has to be clearly established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wildlife, Exotic Pets, and Emerging Zoonoses1
Chomel, B. B., Belotto, A., & Meslin, F.-X. (2007) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1301.060480 · Cited by 551
Mor, S. M., Wiethoelter, A. K., Lee, A., Moloney, B., James, D. R., & Malik, R. (2016) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-016-0835-0 · Cited by 56
“Increasingly, recreational activities such as hunting of feral animals and wildlife have emerged as an alternative risk factor [3].”
BackgroundWoldemeskel, M. (2013) · Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.4236/ojvm.2013.33034 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Godfroid, J., Cloeckaert, A., Liautard, J.-P., Kohler, S., Fretin, D., Walravens, K., Garin-Bastuji, B., & Letesson, J.-J.
- Venue
- Veterinary Research
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-326
- ISSN
- 0928-4249 (ISSN-L)
- 1297-9716
- OpenAlex
- W2156404282
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the discovery of the Malta fever?s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/vetres:2005003
- The paper
- Godfroid, J., Cloeckaert, A., Liautard, J.-P., Kohler, S., Fretin, D., Walravens, K., Garin-Bastuji, B., & Letesson, J.-J. (2005). From the discovery of the Malta fever?s agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Veterinary Research. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres%3A2005003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.