Hyperactive tendon reflexes in spastic multiple sclerosis: Measures and mechanisms of action
Abstract
Objective To develop new measures of tendon reflexes and evaluate hyperactive reflexes in patients with spastic multiple sclerosis (MS).Design With the subject relaxed, a hand-held instrumented hammer was used to tap the patellar tendon and record the tapping force, while knee extension torque and quadriceps EMG were recorded isometrically as measures of the reflex response.Setting Research laboratory in a rehabilitation hospital.Subjects Ten spastic MS and 14 healthy subjects.Main outcome measures Tendon tapping force (designated as system input), reflex torque (as output), their dynamic relationship (characterized as system parameters tendon reflex gain, contraction rate, and reflex loop delay), Ashworth scale, and tendon reflex scale.Results The system parameters provide more repeatable measures than do input or output parameters alone because they quantify the input and output simultaneously and dynamically. Compared with control subjects, MS patients had a significantly lower threshold in tapping force (p = .026), yet their evoked reflex torque was significantly higher (p = .033). Despite significant quadriceps weakness (p < .0001), MS patients had a significantly higher reflex gain (p = .0002) and contraction rate (p = .0002), and shorter reflex loop delay (p = .0046), indicating hyperexcitability of motoneurons and peripheral receptors, and indicating that relatively more of the muscle was activated reflexively, with greater recruitment of larger fast-twitch fibers. Both the reflex gain and rate measures correlated more closely with the Ashworth scale and tendon reflex scale than did the output measures, indicating their potential clinical value.Conclusions With appropriate simplification, the method may be used in clinical practice to quantify more precisely the tendon jerk than is currently feasible with standard clinical tests.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Zhang, L.-Q., Wang, G., Nishida, T., Xu, D., Sliwa, J. A., & Rymer, W. Z.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 901-909
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095649429
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns019331-14)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-19331)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR45634, R01AR045634)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Keywords
- deep tendon reflexes, patellar reflex, hyperexcitability, reflex gain, knee extension torque, Ashworth scale, tapping force
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Knee, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Spasticity, Reaction Time, Reflex, Stretch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review