Cited by 288Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Gross motor function of children with down syndrome: creation of motor growth curves.

Palisano, Robert J., Walter, Stephen D., Russell, Dianne J., Rosenbaum, Peter L., Gémus, Maryan, Galuppi, Barbara E., Cunningham, Larry·2001·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To create gross motor function growth curves for children with Down syndrome (DS) and to estimate the probability that motor functions are achieved by different ages. Design Nonlinear growth curve analysis by using a 2-parameter (rate, upper limit) model. Setting Early intervention programs, schools, and children's homes. Participants One hundred twenty-one children with DS, ages 1 month to 6 years. Main outcome measures Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and severity of motor impairment. Results The curves for children with mild (n = 51) and moderate/severe (n = 70) impairment were characterized by a greater increase in GMFM scores during infancy and smaller increases as the children approached the predicted maximum score of 85.9 or 87.9. The estimated probability that a child would roll by 6 months was 51%; sit by 12 months, 78%; crawl by 18 months, 34%; walk by 24 months, 40%; and run, walk up stairs, and jump by 5 years, 45% to 52%. Conclusions Children with DS require more time to learn movements as movement complexity increases. Impairment severity affected the rate but not the upper limit of motor function. The results have implications for counseling parents, making decisions about motor interventions, and anticipating the time frame for achievement of motor functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/apmr.2001.21956

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor deficits are present at birth in Down syndrome, indicating that changes in cellular circuitry of the spinal cord likely precede adulthood.

    “However, motor deficits are present at birth indicating that changes in cellular circuitry of the spinal cord likely precede adulthood.”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Palisano et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palisano, R. J., Walter, S. D., Russell, D. J., Rosenbaum, P. L., Gémus, M., Galuppi, B. E., & Cunningham, L.
Affiliations
CanChild Centre for Childhood-onset Disability Research (CA)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
494-500
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152508103
Cited by
288
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
Down syndrome, gross motor function, motor development, Gross Motor Function Measure, motor impairment severity, motor milestones, early intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Motor Skills, Probability, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review