Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the 6-minute walk test a reliable substitute for peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?

Zugck, C·2000·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: The 6-min walk test may serve as a more simple clinical tool to assess functional capacity in congestive heart failure than determination of peak oxygen uptake by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The purpose of the study was to prospectively examine whether the distance ambulated during a 6-min walk test (i) correlates with peak oxygen uptake, (ii) allows peak oxygen uptake to be predicted, and (iii) provides prognostic information similar to peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 113 patients (age: 54+/-12 years, NYHA: 2.2+/-0.8) with dilated cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 19+/-7%) a 6-min walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were performed. The 6-min walk test and peak oxygen uptake were closely correlated at the initial visit (r=0.68, n=113), as well as after 263+/-114 (r=0.71, n=28) and 381+/-170 days (r=0.74, n=14). During serial exercise testing the 6-min walk test allowed peak oxygen uptake to be reliably predicted (r=0.76 between calculated and real peak oxygen uptake). After 528+/-234 days, 42 patients were hospitalized due to worsening heart failure and/or died from cardiovascular causes. Compared to clinically stable patients, these 42 patients walked a shorter distance (423+/-104 vs 501+/-95 m, P<0.001) and had a lower peak oxygen uptake (12.7+/-4.0 vs 17.4 + 5.6 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1), P<0.001). By univariate analysis the 6-min walk test outperformed other prognostic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index and plasma norepinephrine concentration and conferred a prognostic power similar to peak oxygen uptake. This predictive value could be further improved in a multivariate model, by combining the 6-min walk test with independent variables, such as left ventricular ejection fraction or cardiac index. CONCLUSION: The 6-min walk test correlated with peak oxygen uptake when tested serially over the course of the disease. Although both tests define two distinct domains of functional capacity, the 6-min walk test provides prognostic information very similar to peak oxygen uptake in congestive heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/euhj.1999.1861

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Zugck, C.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
540-549
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062884888
Cited by
250
References
2
FWCI
25.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the 6-minute walk test a reliable substitute for peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/euhj.1999.1861
The paper
Zugck, C. (2000). Is the 6-minute walk test a reliable substitute for peak oxygen uptake in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy? European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1999.1861

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.