Cited by 224Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Effect of cardiac sympathetic nervous activity on mode of death in congestive heart failure

Brunner-La Rocca, H·2001·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate whether strong cardiac sympathetic activity contributes primarily to sudden death or to worsening heart failure, and to determine the relationship of the size of cardiac noradrenaline stores to the mode of death. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 116 patients with congestive heart failure (ejection fraction 19+/-7%) and a mean follow-up of 18+/-19 months. Cardiac sympathetic nervous function was measured using coronary sinus blood sampling and noradrenaline isotope dilution methodology. Cardiac sympathetic activity was estimated from cardiac noradrenaline spillover, and noradrenaline stores from the overflow of the tritiated noradrenaline metabolite [(3)H]dihydroxyphenylglycol, which is produced by monoamine oxidase inside nerve endings. Small cardiac noradrenaline stores (below median) predicted death from worsening heart failure (hazard ratio=4.18, P<0.05), particularly if cardiac noradrenaline spillover was elevated (hazard ratio=2.36 per tertile, P<0.01), indicating progression of disease associated with defective sympathetic innervation. In contrast, large stores (hazard ratio=2.81, P<0.05), especially if coupled with increased noradrenaline spillover (hazard ratio=1.64 per tertile, P<0.05), were related to sudden death. CONCLUSION: High cardiac sympathetic activity is a risk factor for sudden death, particularly in the presence of intact cardiac sympathetic innervation. Conversely, progression of myocardial disease and heart failure is closely associated with depletion of sympathetic nerves in the heart, especially if rates of noradrenaline release paradoxically remain high.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/euhj.2000.2407

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impairment of pressure natriuresis is believed to be a central element in the development of hypertension.

    “Impairment of pressure natriuresis is believed to be a central element in the development of hypertension94,95,8.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 224

Authors
Brunner-La Rocca, H.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
13
Pages
1136-1143
ISSN
0195-668X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152270279
Cited by
224
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
congestive heart failure, sudden death, mode of death, noradrenaline spillover, dihydroxyphenylglycol, sympathetic innervation, heart failure progression, risk factors
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Methoxyhydroxyphenylglycol, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine, Risk Factors, Sympathetic Nervous System, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review