A preliminary trial of high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis
Open accessAbstract
Background & aims Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases including primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) for which it has a positive effect on laboratory values, may delay the development of liver failure and prolong the transplant-free disease period. Standard doses of UDCA (8-15 mg/kg daily) have been shown to be ineffective in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We report on the findings (clinical, biochemical, histological, and cholangiographic) and side effects of a 2-year double-blind placebo-controlled preliminary study of high-dose UDCA in PSC patients.Methods Twenty-six patients with PSC were randomized to high-dose (20 mg/kg daily) UDCA or placebo. Cholangiography and liver biopsy were performed at entry and after 2 years. Symptoms, clinical signs, and liver biochemical tests were recorded at 3 monthly intervals.Results High-dose UDCA did not influence symptoms, but there was a significant improvement in liver biochemistry (serum alkaline phosphatase, P = 0.03; gamma-glutamyl transferase, P = 0.01) and a significant reduction in progression in cholangiographic appearances (P = 0.015) and liver fibrosis as assessed by disease staging (P = 0.05). In the treatment group, a significant increase in total bile acids and saturation with UDCA >70% confirmed patient compliance. No significant side effects were reported.Conclusions High-dose UDCA may be of clinical benefit in PSC, but trials with a larger number of participants and of longer duration are required to establish whether the effect of high-dose UDCA on liver biochemistry, histology, and cholangiography in patients with PSC is translated into improved long-term survival.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smaller pilot trials with even higher UDCA doses (20-30 mg/kg/d) demonstrated improvement of liver tests, histological (Ishak staging) and cholangiographic features, Mayo risk score and projected survival.
“Smaller pilot trials with even higher UDCA doses (20-30 mg/kg/ d) demonstrated improvement of liver tests, 153,154,156 histological (Ishak staging) and cholangiographic features, 153 Mayo risk score and projected survival.154,156”
From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis (2022) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 351
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Martins EB, Graham AK, Healey CJ, Chapman RW, Fleming KA. Activated lymphocytes in the liver of patients with primary scle- rosing cholangitis: results of a morphometric study. Gut 1994; 35:S20.
- Mitchell SA, Chapman RW, Fleming KA. Enhanced Cytokine mRNA expression in primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune liver disease. Gastroenterology 1997;112:A757.
- Stiehl A, Raedsch R, Kommerell B. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis. A comparison to primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1988;94:A595.
- Stiehl A, Raedsch R, Rudolph G, Theilmann L. Treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis with ursodexoycholic acid: first results of a controlled study. Hepatology 1989;10:A602.
- O'Brien S, Craig PI, Hatfield AR. The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis: results of a pilot study. Gastroenterology 1993;104:A966.
- Van-Thiel DH, Wright HI, Gavaler JS. Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for primary sclerosing cholangitis: preliminary report of a random- ized controlled trial. Hepatology 1992;16:62A.
- Van Hoogstraten HJ, Wolfhagen FJ, Van de Meeberg PC, van Buuren HR, van Berge H, Schalm SW. Single versus three times daily ursodeoxycholic acid for primary sclerosing cholangitis: re- sults of a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:A1352.
- Authors
- Mitchell, S. A., Bansi, D. S., Hunt, N., Bergmann, K. V., Fleming, K. A., & Chapman, R. W.
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 900-907
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968221120
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- ursodeoxycholic acid, primary sclerosing cholangitis, cholestatic liver disease, liver fibrosis, liver biochemistry, cholangiography, bile acids, medication adherence, treatment side effects
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Child, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Cholangiography, Cholestyramine Resin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Middle Aged, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Cholangitis, Sclerosing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review