Cited by 169Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Primary biliary cirrhosis: Incidence and predictive factors of cirrhosis development in ursodiol-treated patients

Open access
Corpechot, Christophe, Carrat, Fabrice, Poupon, Raoul, Poupon, Renee–Eugenie·2002·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) slows the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some UDCA-treated patients escape and progress toward cirrhosis and end-stage disease. This study aimed to assess the incidence of cirrhosis in UDCA-treated patients with PBC and to determine the predictive factors of cirrhosis development under this treatment.Methods A Markov model was used to describe the progression toward cirrhosis in 183 UDCA-treated patients with PBC. A total of 254 pairs of liver biopsy specimens collected during 655 patient-years were studied.Results The incidence of cirrhosis after 5 years of UDCA treatment was 4%, 12%, and 59% among patients followed-up from stages I, II, and III, respectively. At 10 years, the incidence was 17%, 27%, and 76%, respectively. The median time for developing cirrhosis from stages I, II, and III was 25 years, 20 years, and 4 years, respectively. The independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development were serum bilirubin greater than 17 mumol/L, serum albumin less than 38 g/L, and moderate to severe lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis.Conclusions This study provides new data about the time course of PBC under UDCA and constitutes a rationale for the design and evaluation of clinical trials aimed to assess the efficacy of drugs associated with UDCA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/gast.2002.31880

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a lymphoplasmacytic interface hepatitis is a marker of more rapidly progressive disease.

    “A detailed review of liver histology suggests that the presence of a lymphoplasmacytic interface hepatitis is a marker of more rapidly progressive disease14 96”

    From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) identify the severity of lymphocytic piecemeal necrosis as an independent predictor of histologic progression toward cirrhosis in ursodiol-treated patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The paper does not establish that the mere presence of specifically lymphoplasmacytic interface hepatitis predicts more rapid progression. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The incidence of cirrhosis after 5 years of UDCA treatment was 4% and 59% among patients followed-up from stages 1 and 3, respectively (17% and 76%, respectively after 10 years). The median time for developing cirrhosis from stages 1 and 3 was 25 years and 4 years, respectively.

    “The incidence of cirrhosis after 5 years of UDCA treatment was 4% and 59% among patients followed-up from stages 1 (early disease) and 3 (fibrosis), respectively (17% and 76%, respectively after 10 years). The median time for developing cirrhosis from stages 1 and 3 was 25 years and 4 years, respectively.”
  • The independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development were serum bilirubin >17 μmol/L, serum albumin <38 g/L and moderate to severe lymphocytic interface hepatitis.

    “The independent predictive factors of cirrhosis development were serum bilirubin >17 µmol/L, serum albumin <38 g/L and moderate to severe lymphocytic interface hepatitis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 169

Authors
Corpechot, C., Carrat, F., Poupon, R., & Poupon, R.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
652-658
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123805246
Cited by
169
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid, disease progression, predictive factors, serum bilirubin, serum albumin, Markov model, liver biopsy staging
MeSH terms
Bilirubin, Cholagogues and Choleretics, Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Necrosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Serum Albumin, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review