Cited by 0Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gastric surgery and Barrett's esophagus

Open access
Parrilla, Pascual·2002·Gastroenterology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/gast.2002.35767

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Parrilla, P.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (ES)
Corresponding author
Parrilla, Pascual
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
954
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091484130
Cited by
0
References
3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
gastric surgery, Barrett's esophagus, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, esophageal adenocarcinoma
MeSH terms
Barrett Esophagus, Humans, Stomach, Digestive System Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review