Cited by 2,893Liver Disease and TransplantationOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Open access
Malinchoc, Michael, Kamath, Patrick S., Gordon, Fredric D., Peine, Craig J., Rank, Jeffrey, ter Borg, Pieter C.J.·2000·Hepatology

Abstract

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) may worsen liver function and decrease survival in some patients. The Child-Pugh classification has several drawbacks when used to determine survival in such patients. The survival of 231 patients at 4 medical centers within the United States who underwent elective TIPS was studied to develop statistical models to (1) predict patient survival and (2) identify those patients whose liver-related mortality post-TIPS would be 3 months or less. Among these elective TIPS patients, 173 had the procedure for prevention of variceal rebleeding and 58 for treatment of refractory ascites. Death related to liver disease occurred in 110 patients, 70 within 3 months. Cox proportional-hazards regression identified serum concentrations of bilirubin and creatinine, international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR), and the cause of the underlying liver disease as predictors of survival in patients undergoing elective TIPS, either for prevention of variceal rebleeding or for treatment of refractory ascites. These variables can be used to calculate a risk score (R) for patients undergoing elective TIPS. Patients with R > 1.8 had a median survival of 3 months or less. This model was superior to both the Child-Pugh classification, as well as the Child-Pugh score, in predicting survival. Using logistic regression and the same variables, we also developed a nomogram that indicates which patients survive less than 3 months. Finally, the mo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/he.2000.5852

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing EHRs suffer from bias because of how patients and their care are captured.

    “But existing EHRs suffer from bias because of how patients and their care are captured.”
  • Many large databases have fundamental bias and do not reflect the target population of patient being treated.

    “the fundamental bias in many large databases that do not reflect the target population of patient being treated making fairness an important issue to address”
  • The rapid advances in AI, and in particular the release of publicly available generative AI applications leveraging advanced large language models, have greatly accelerated discussions considering the promises and pitfalls related to AI deployment in society and healthcare.

    “The rapid advances in AI, and in particular the release of publicly available generative AI applications leveraging advanced large language models, have greatly accelerated discussions considering the promises and pitfalls related to AI deployment in society and healthcare [7–17].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 2,893

Authors
Malinchoc, M., Kamath, P. S., Gordon, F. D., Peine, C. J., Rank, J., & ter Borg, P. C. J.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Kamath, Patrick S.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2000-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
864-871
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162322495
Cited by
2,893
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 152 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 165 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 146 · 2014: 140 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 139
FWCI
28.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 34238, R01DK034238)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, survival prediction, liver-related mortality, refractory ascites, Child-Pugh score, risk score, nomogram, serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, international normalized ratio, underlying liver disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Ascites, Bacterial Infections, Bilirubin, Creatinine, Hepatic Encephalopathy, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Mathematics, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Peritonitis, Prothrombin Time, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Liver Transplantation, Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review