CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and Safety of a Very-Low-Protein Diet When Postponing Dialysis in the Elderly: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Study

Brunori, Giuliano, Viola, Battista F., Parrinello, Giovanni, De Biase, Vincenzo, Como, Giovanna, Franco, Vincenzo, Garibotto, Giacomo, Zubani, Roberto, Cancarini, Giovanni C.·2007·American Journal of Kidney Diseases
DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.278
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background A supplemented very-low-protein diet (sVLPD) seems to be safe when postponing dialysis therapy. Study design Prospective multicenter randomized controlled study designed to assess the noninferiority of diet versus dialysis in 1-year mortality assessed by using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Setting & participants Italian uremic patients without diabetes older than 70 years with glomerular filtration rate of 5 to 7 mL/min (0.08 to 0.12 mL/s). Intervention Randomization to an sVLPD (diet group) or dialysis. The sVLPD is a vegan diet (35 kcal; proteins, 0.3 g/kg body weight daily) supplemented with keto-analogues, amino acids, and vitamins. Patients following an sVLPD started dialysis therapy in the case of malnutrition, intractable fluid overload, hyperkalemia, or appearance of uremic symptoms. Outcomes & measurements Mortality, hospitalization, and metabolic markers. Results 56 patients were randomly assigned to each group, median follow-up was 26.5 months (interquartile range, 40), and patients in the diet group spent a median of 10.7 months (interquartile range, 11) following an sVLPD. Forty patients in the diet group started dialysis treatment because of either fluid overload or hyperkalemia. There were 31 deaths (55%) in the dialysis group and 28 deaths (50%) in the diet group. One-year observed survival rates at intention to treat were 83.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.5 to 94.0) in the dialysis group versus 87.3% (95% CI, 78.9 to 96.5) in the diet group (log-rank test for noninferiority, P < 0.001; for superiority, P = 0.6): the difference in survival was -3.6% (95% CI, -17 to +10; P = 0.002). The hazard ratio for hospitalization was 1.50 for the dialysis group (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.01; P < 0.01). Limitations The unblinded nature of the study, exclusion of patients with diabetes, and incomplete enrollment. Conclusion An sVLPD was effective and safe when postponing dialysis treatment in elderly patients without diabetes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.278

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 1997, KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines, Am J Kidney Dis, 30, S70
  2. 2002, Section I, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 17, S7
  3. Krediet, 2005, The initiation of dialysis, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 20, Six3
  4. 2001, K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: Update 2000, Am J Kidney Dis, 37, S65
  5. 2001, K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy: Update 2000, Am J Kidney Dis, 37, S7
  6. 2006, Part 2: Chronic Kidney Disease, Acute Renal Failure and End of Life Care

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brunori, G., Viola, B. F., Parrinello, G., De Biase, V., Como, G., Franco, V., Garibotto, G., Zubani, R., & Cancarini, G. C.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Brunori, Giuliano
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
569-580
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.278
OpenAlex
W1993837538
Cited by
263
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
very low protein diet, end-stage renal disease, elderly patients, uremia, non-inferiority, one-year mortality, hospitalization, hyperkalemia, fluid overload, malnutrition, vegan diet, amino acid supplementation, vitamin supplementation, metabolic biomarkers, dialysis initiation timing
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Diet, Protein-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review