Cited by 107Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Effect of Fenofibrate on Kidney Function: A 6-Week Randomized Crossover Trial in Healthy People

Ansquer, Jean-Claude, Dalton, R. Neil, Caussé, Elisabeth, Crimet, Dominique, Le Malicot, Karine, Foucher, Christelle·2008·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

Background Fenofibrate was associated with increases in serum creatinine concentrations. The effect of short-term fenofibrate treatment on kidney function was investigated in subjects with normal kidney function. Study design Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled. Setting and participants 24 middle-aged subjects with normal kidney function (estimated creatinine clearance > or = 80 mL/min). Intervention Subjects were treated with fenofibrate (160-mg/d tablet) and placebo in two 6-week periods separated by a washout. Outcomes and measurements The primary outcome measure was glomerular filtration rate measured by means of inulin clearance, with a test of noninferiority to rule out a change in the 95% confidence interval (CI) greater than 20%. Secondary outcomes included effective renal plasma flow measured by means of para-aminohippurate (PAH) clearance, creatinine clearance, creatinine secretion (ratio of creatinine to inulin clearance), serum cystatin C and uric acid, and urinary excretion of creatinine. Glomerular and tubular damage was evaluated by using albumin and retinol-binding protein levels and N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase activity. Results Inulin clearance was unchanged after fenofibrate (change [Delta] between treatments on 6-week values, 0.8 mL/min; 95% CI, -10.5 to 12.2; P = 0.9), but PAH clearance decreased (Delta, -33; 95% CI, -66 to -1; P = 0.05). Changes in inulin and PAH clearances were not greater than 20%. Plasma creatinine level increased (Delta, 0…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.01.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 107

Authors
Ansquer, J.-C., Dalton, R. N., Caussé, E., Crimet, D., Le Malicot, K., & Foucher, C.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
Corresponding author
Foucher, Christelle
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
904-913
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978960952
Cited by
107
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
fenofibrate, renal function, glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, inulin clearance, para-aminohippurate clearance, cystatin C, uric acid, tubular damage, drug-induced nephrotoxicity, non-inferiority, healthy volunteers, albuminuria
MeSH terms
Adult, Hypolipidemic Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review