Cited by 91Electrolyte and hormonal disordersIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Tonicity Balance in Patients With Hypernatremia Acquired in the Intensive Care Unit

Lindner, Gregor, Kneidinger, Nikolaus, Holzinger, Ulrike, Druml, Wilfred, Schwarz, Christoph·2009·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

Background Hypernatremia is a serious electrolyte disturbance and an independent risk factor for mortality in critically ill patients. In many cases, hypernatremia is an iatrogenic problem that develops in the intensive care unit (ICU). Study design Case series. Setting & participants 45 patients were studied in a medical ICU. For inclusion in the study, patients needed to show an increase in serum sodium concentration to greater than 149 mEq/L from an initial concentration of less than 146 mEq/L. Outcomes Solute balance, fluid balance, and both. Causes of hypernatremia. Measurements The daily mass balance of sodium, potassium, and water over 1- to 3-day intervals was measured while serum sodium levels were increasing. Results During the study period, 69 of 981 patients (7%) acquired hypernatremia after admission to the ICU. Of these, 45 had sufficient data for evaluation. Maximum serum sodium levels were 150 to 164 mEq/L. The average duration of hypernatremia was 2 days (range, 1 to 10 days), with an average onset on day 5.9 +/- 4.3 of the ICU stay. Patients were classified as having a positive solute balance (n = 17; 38%), negative fluid balance (n = 20; 44%), or both (n = 8; 18%). The most important extrarenal factors contributing to hypernatremia were fever (45%) and diarrhea (18%). Polyuria was observed in 38% of patients and 35% had acute renal failure. Hypertonic solutions were administered to 27% of patients. Limitations Retrospective analysis; lack of daily measureme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults with low-intake dehydration have poorer outcomes than those who are well-hydrated.

    “There is some evidence that older adults with low-intake dehydration have poorer outcomes than those who are well-hydrated (215).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindner, G., Kneidinger, N., Holzinger, U., Druml, W., & Schwarz, C.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen (AT)
Corresponding author
Lindner, Gregor
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
674-679
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000899586
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
hypernatremia, intensive care unit, solute balance, fluid balance, electrolyte imbalance, fever, diarrhea, polyuria, acute kidney injury, hypertonic solutions, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Hypernatremia, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sodium, Water-Electrolyte Imbalance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review